[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180717040346.GE12945@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:03:46 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH rcu] rcutorture: err_segs_recorded can be static
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 09:44:52AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
>
> Fixes: 07809ecaa895 ("rcutorture: Dump reader protection sequence if failures or close calls")
> Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Good catch! I have folded this in with attribution.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> rcutorture.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> index ef85bde..a7a947e 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> @@ -209,9 +209,9 @@ struct rt_read_seg {
> unsigned long rt_delay_us;
> bool rt_preempted;
> };
> -int err_segs_recorded;
> -struct rt_read_seg err_segs[RCUTORTURE_RDR_MAX_SEGS];
> -int rt_read_nsegs;
> +static int err_segs_recorded;
> +static struct rt_read_seg err_segs[RCUTORTURE_RDR_MAX_SEGS];
> +static int rt_read_nsegs;
>
> static const char *rcu_torture_writer_state_getname(void)
> {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists