linux-kernel - Re: dvb usb issues since kernel 4.9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180718072107.0bfdece8@vela.lan>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jul 2018 07:21:07 +0900
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     hannah@...vell.com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Josef Griebichler <griebichler.josef@....at>,
        Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...hat.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        dma <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, vkoul@...nel.org,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, nadavh@...vell.com,
        thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, omrii@...vell.com
Subject: Re: dvb usb issues since kernel 4.9

Hi Linus,

Em Tue, 17 Jul 2018 10:09:28 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> escreveu:

> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:58 AM Hanna Hawa <hannah@...vell.com> wrote:
> >
> > After some debug/bisect/diff, found that patch "softirq: Let ksoftirqd
> > do its job" is problematic patch.  
> 
> Ok, this thread died down without any resolution.
> 
> >- Using v4.14.0 (including softirq patch) and the additional fix
> > proposed by Linus - no timeout issue.  
> 
> Are you talking about the patch that made HI_SOFTIRQ and
> TASKLET_SOFTIRQ special, and had this:
> 
>   #define SOFTIRQ_NOW_MASK ((1 << HI_SOFTIRQ) | (1 << TASKLET_SOFTIRQ))
> 
> in it?
> 
> I think I'll just commit the damn thing. It's hacky, but it's simple,
> and it never got applied because we had smarter suggestions. But the
> smarter suggestions never ended up being applied either, so..

Yeah, IMHO the best would be to apply your patch[1], c/c stable up to
4.9. Nothing prevents applying a better/smarter solution once we
have it. From my side, I can keep testing whatever smart suggestions
people propose. Yet, better to have one fix on our hand than two
fixes flying around.

[1] e. g. 
	https://git.linuxtv.org/mchehab/experimental.git/commit/?h=v4.15%2bmedia%2bdwc2&id=ccf833fd4a5b99c3d3cf2c09c065670f74a230a7

Regards,
Mauro