[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFjuzB9632y6RbdxvjUBWXQX8YbSO7GJ6TWP_SCtrpt4Vy5t1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 15:40:28 +1000
From: Jon Maxwell <jmaxwell@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Jon Maxwell <jmaxwell37@...il.com>,
"Miller, David" <davem@...emloft.net>, edumazet@...gle.com,
ncardwell@...gle.com, David.Laight@...lab.com,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Series to improve setsockopt()
TCP_USER_TIMEOUT accuracy
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 07/16/2018 09:15 PM, Jon Maxwell wrote:
>> This is a patch series based on:
>>
>> Jon Maxwell (3):
>> [PATCH net-next 1/3] tcp: convert icsk_user_timeout from jiffies to msecs
>> [PATCH net-next v1 2/3] tcp: convert icsk_user_timeout from jiffies to msecs
>> [PATCH net-next v1 3/3] tcp: convert icsk_user_timeout from jiffies to msecs
>
> This would have been nice to use meaningful titles for each patch,
> instead of copy/pasting the first one ?
>
> Thanks !
>
>
>
This is my 1st time doing a patch series. Let me rebase and resubmit
each with a more descriptive title.
But 1st do I still need to put the patch number in the series? Even if
the title differs?
1) e.g:
Jon Maxwell (3):
[PATCH net-next 1/3] tcp: convert icsk_user_timeout from jiffies to msecs
[PATCH net-next 2/3] tcp: Add tcp_retransmit_stamp() helper
[PATCH net-next 3/3] tcp: Add tcp_clamp_rto_to_user_timeout() to
improve accuracy
2) or:
Jon Maxwell (3):
[PATCH net-next] tcp: convert icsk_user_timeout from jiffies to msecs
[PATCH net-next] tcp: Add tcp_retransmit_time() helper
[PATCH net-next] tcp: Add tcp_clamp_rto_to_user_timeout() to
improve TCP_USER_TIMEOUT accuracy
Which is preferred (1) or (2)? Are the above titles descriptive enough?
Regards
Jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists