[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180717180028.0ba098f6@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:00:28 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, ssantosh@...nel.org,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Samuel Morris <samorris@...mark.com>
Subject: Re: 4.18.0-rc1-next-20180619 boot failed on beagle board x15
Hi Tony,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 23:08:08 -0700 Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
>
> The following regression is still pending in next, see below.
>
> * Samuel Morris <samorris@...mark.com> [180702 13:35]:
> > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 5:32 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > * Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> [180621 14:56]:
> > >> On 21/06/18 17:31, Samuel Morris wrote:
> > >> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:58 AM, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> wrote:
> > >> >> +Rafael
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On 20/06/18 18:30, Samuel Morris wrote:
> > >> >>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> wrote:
> > >> >>>> Tony,
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> On 20/06/18 13:29, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >> >>>>> Hi,
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> * Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> [180620 05:55]:
> > >> >>>>>> Linux next (4.18.0-rc1-next-20180619) boot failed on beagle board x15.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Bisect points to commit aece27a2f01b ("ata: ahci_platform: allow disabling of
> > >> >>>>> hotplug to save power").
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Reverting the patch makes things work again. Any ideas what
> > >> >>>>> might be going wrong here? Things clearly idle but then there
> > >> >>>>> seems to be some register access with clocks disabled.
> > >
> > > So this issue is still happening as of next-20180702. Can you guys
> > > please revert the commit above while working on a better solution?
> >
> > That's fine with me. I'm not very familiar with the process here, does
> > this require anything on my end? And would that require the
> > accompanying patch to be reverted: "ata: ahci: rpm_put port on
> > port_stop to match rpm_get in port_start"? There shouldn't be any
> > problem leaving that one in, but I just want to know before submitting
> > my next patch set.
>
> Well usually the maintainer just reverts the regression causing
> patch in the related branch and that's it.
>
> Stephen, can you please revert in next until we hear back from
> Tejun?
OK, I have reverted that commit from today. Please let me know when the
problem is fixed in the libata tree ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists