[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180717091152.l4ixicbp6imvqtsr@suselix>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:11:52 +0200
From: Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@...e.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Commit 554c8aa8ecad causing severe performance degression with
pcc-cpufreq
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:06:29AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@...e.com> wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> >
> > On balance before this commit users could use pcc-cpufreq but had
> > already suboptimal performance (compared to say intel_pstate driver
> > which can be used changing BIOS options).
>
> BTW, I wonder why you need to change the BIOS options for intel_pstate to load.
I think this is because of (in intel_pstate_init()):
/*
* The Intel pstate driver will be ignored if the platform
* firmware has its own power management modes.
*/
if (intel_pstate_platform_pwr_mgmt_exists())
return -ENODEV;
> It should be initialized before pcc-cpufreq (according to their
> respective initcall levels), so in theory intel_pstate should be used
> by default on the affected systems anyway.
> What BIOS settings need to be changed for that?
Already answered in other mail.
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists