[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180717114511.GB24361@techadventures.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:45:11 +0200
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...hadventures.net>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
Cc: steven.sistare@...cle.com, daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, mhocko@...e.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com, jack@...e.cz,
jglisse@...hat.com, jrdr.linux@...il.com, bhe@...hat.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
richard.weiyang@...il.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, mingo@...nel.org, abdhalee@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
mpe@...erman.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] mm/sparse: abstract sparse buffer allocations
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 01:44:43PM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> When struct pages are allocated for sparse-vmemmap VA layout, we first try
> to allocate one large buffer, and than if that fails allocate struct pages
> for each section as we go.
>
> The code that allocates buffer is uses global variables and is spread
> across several call sites.
>
> Cleanup the code by introducing three functions to handle the global
> buffer:
>
> sparse_buffer_init() initialize the buffer
> sparse_buffer_fini() free the remaining part of the buffer
> sparse_buffer_alloc() alloc from the buffer, and if buffer is empty
> return NULL
>
> Define these functions in sparse.c instead of sparse-vmemmap.c because
> later we will use them for non-vmemmap sparse allocations as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
I did not see anything wrong, so:
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Thanks
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists