linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the integrity tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1531833486.3380.18.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Jul 2018 09:18:06 -0400
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the integrity tree

On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 14:40 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the integrity tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:549:5: error: redefinition of 'ima_load_data'
>  int ima_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id id)
>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:506:5: note: previous definition of 'ima_load_data' was here
>  int ima_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id id)
>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   4995c7ac4490 ("ima: based on policy require signed kexec kernel images")
> 
> interacting with commit
> 
>   16c267aac86b ("ima: based on policy require signed kexec kernel images")
> 
> from the sceurity tree.
> 
> Basically the same set of patches are in the security tree and the
> integrity tree as different commits.  The merge managed to add this
> function twice.  I have added a patche to remove one copy of the function.
> 
> Please clean up the integrity tree relative to the security tree.

Done