[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180717141614.GE2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 16:16:14 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@...eaurora.org>,
Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] psi: pressure stall information for CPU, memory,
and IO
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 01:29:40PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> +/* Tracked task states */
> +enum psi_task_count {
> + NR_RUNNING,
> + NR_IOWAIT,
> + NR_MEMSTALL,
> + NR_PSI_TASK_COUNTS,
> +};
> +/* Resources that workloads could be stalled on */
> +enum psi_res {
> + PSI_CPU,
> + PSI_MEM,
> + PSI_IO,
> + NR_PSI_RESOURCES,
> +};
These two have mem and iowait in different order. It really doesn't
matter, but my brain stumbled.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists