[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180717154059.GB2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 17:40:59 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@...eaurora.org>,
Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] psi: cgroup support
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 01:29:41PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> +/**
> + * cgroup_move_task - move task to a different cgroup
> + * @task: the task
> + * @to: the target css_set
> + *
> + * Move task to a new cgroup and safely migrate its associated stall
> + * state between the different groups.
> + *
> + * This function acquires the task's rq lock to lock out concurrent
> + * changes to the task's scheduling state and - in case the task is
> + * running - concurrent changes to its stall state.
> + */
> +void cgroup_move_task(struct task_struct *task, struct css_set *to)
> +{
> + unsigned int task_flags = 0;
> + struct rq_flags rf;
> + struct rq *rq;
> + u64 now;
> +
> + rq = task_rq_lock(task, &rf);
> +
> + if (task_on_rq_queued(task)) {
> + task_flags = TSK_RUNNING;
> + } else if (task->in_iowait) {
> + task_flags = TSK_IOWAIT;
> + }
> + if (task->flags & PF_MEMSTALL)
> + task_flags |= TSK_MEMSTALL;
> +
> + if (task_flags) {
> + update_rq_clock(rq);
> + now = rq_clock(rq);
> + psi_task_change(task, now, task_flags, 0);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Lame to do this here, but the scheduler cannot be locked
> + * from the outside, so we move cgroups from inside sched/.
> + */
> + rcu_assign_pointer(task->cgroups, to);
> +
> + if (task_flags)
> + psi_task_change(task, now, 0, task_flags);
> +
> + task_rq_unlock(rq, task, &rf);
> +}
Why is that not part of cpu_cgroup_attach() / sched_move_task() ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists