[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180717160035.9422-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 19:00:33 +0300
From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] fs/fuse, splice_write: Don't access pipe->buffers without pipe_lock()
fuse_dev_splice_write() reads pipe->buffers to determine the size of
'bufs' array before taking the pipe_lock(). This is not safe as
another thread might change the 'pipe->buffers' between the allocation
and taking the pipe_lock(). So we end up with too small 'bufs' array.
Move the bufs allocations inside pipe_lock()/pipe_unlock() to fix this.
Fixes: dd3bb14f44a6 ("fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device")
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index c6b88fa85e2e..702592cce546 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -1944,12 +1944,15 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
if (!fud)
return -EPERM;
+ pipe_lock(pipe);
+
bufs = kmalloc_array(pipe->buffers, sizeof(struct pipe_buffer),
GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!bufs)
+ if (!bufs) {
+ pipe_unlock(pipe);
return -ENOMEM;
+ }
- pipe_lock(pipe);
nbuf = 0;
rem = 0;
for (idx = 0; idx < pipe->nrbufs && rem < len; idx++)
--
2.16.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists