[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180718203725.GD20228@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 22:37:25 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: keescook@...omium.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, s.mesoraca16@...il.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, David.Laight@...lab.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: dsa: Remove VLA usage
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:33:33AM +0900, David Miller wrote:
> From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:10:34 -0700
>
> > From: Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@...il.com>
> >
> > We avoid 2 VLAs by using a pre-allocated field in dsa_switch. We also
> > try to avoid dynamic allocation whenever possible (when using fewer than
> > bits-per-long ports, which is the common case).
> >
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180505185145.GB32630@lunn.ch
> > Signed-off-by: Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@...il.com>
> > [kees: tweak commit subject and message slightly]
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>
> Florian and Andrew, please review.
Last time there was some discussion of just always allocating it to
make the code simpler. But the extra complexity is O.K.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists