linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mtd: nuc900_nand: mark expected switch fall-through

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180718100309.49c5452a@xps13>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jul 2018 10:03:09 +0200
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc:     Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@...il.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nuc900_nand: mark expected switch fall-through

Hi Gustavo,

Prefix should be "mtd: rawnand: nuc900:"

"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote on Tue, 10 Jul
2018 08:29:02 -0500:

> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1471717 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c
> index af5b32c9..53a9f6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c
> @@ -191,8 +191,9 @@ static void nuc900_nand_command_lp(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
>  		return;
>  
>  	case NAND_CMD_READ0:
> -
>  		write_cmd_reg(nand, NAND_CMD_READSTART);
> +		/* fall through */

Have you checked this is actually the right thing to do?

Thanks,
Miquèl