[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93d979554b031755fafc03ded90560d3aaec40a3.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 01:41:07 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Avoid pr_cont() in show_opcodes()
On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 14:19 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> []
> > @@ -93,26 +93,15 @@ static void printk_stack_address(unsigned long address, int reliable,
> > */
> > void show_opcodes(u8 *rip, const char *loglvl)
> > {
> > - unsigned int code_prologue = OPCODE_BUFSIZE * 2 / 3;
> > + const unsigned int prologue = OPCODE_BUFSIZE * 2 / 3;
>
> And this might be better as a #define to avoid
> a few more bytes of stack consumption.
Apologies for this silly suggestion.
automatics are not structs and gcc will eliminate
this declaration at all compiler optimization levels.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists