linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] tcp: improve setsockopt() TCP_USER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5aafc511-15a1-da3c-19f8-cc8b658f9c3d@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:20:51 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Jon Maxwell <jmaxwell37@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     edumazet@...gle.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, ncardwell@...gle.com,
        David.Laight@...lab.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
        yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jmaxwell@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] tcp: improve setsockopt() TCP_USER_TIMEOUT
 accuracy



On 07/17/2018 05:46 PM, Jon Maxwell wrote:
> Based on:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10516195/
> 

I must confess I am lost with your submissions.

Patchwork is also lost ( https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/ )

Are you really using git format-patch ?

Normally all the patches should have a common [PATCH Vx net-next] string

git format-patch -o ../output --cover-letter --subject-prefix "PATCH V3 net-next" HEAD~3