linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] crypto: add IV generation templates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0T0Ku-2GOY8fT38LVy4GpvVSsx=szi0ZNEUq8Z_hZweQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:59:07 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>
Cc:     Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] crypto: add IV generation templates

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Xiongfeng Wang
<wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> I tested the performance of software implemented ciphers before and after
> applying this patchset. The performance didn't change much except for
> slight regression when writting. The detail information is as follows.
>
> The command I used:
> cryptsetup -y -c aes-xts-plain -s 256 --hash sha256 luksFormat /dev/sdd1
> cryptsetup -y -c aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 -s 256 --hash sha256 luksFormat /dev/sdd1
> cryptsetup -y -c aes-cbc-benbi -s 256 --hash sha256 luksFormat /dev/sdd1
>
> cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sdd1 crypt_fun
> time dd if=/dev/mapper/crypt_fun of=/dev/null bs=1M count=500 iflag=direct
> time dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/mapper/crypt_fun bs=1M count=500 oflag=direct
>
> Performance comparision:
> --------------------------------------------------------
> algorithms      | before applying   |   after applying
> --------------------------------------------------------
>                 |  read  | write    |  read  | write
> --------------------------------------------------------
> aes-xts-plain   | 145.34 | 145.09   | 145.89 | 144.2
> --------------------------------------------------------
> aes-cbc-essiv   | 146.87 | 144.62   | 146.74 | 143.41
> --------------------------------------------------------
> aes-cbc-benbi   | 146.03 | 144.74   | 146.77 | 144.46
> --------------------------------------------------------

Do you have any estimate of the expected gains for hardware
implementations?

Would it make sense to try out implementing aes-cbc-essiv
on the ARMv8 crypto extensions? I see that Ard has done
some prior work on aes-ccm in arch/arm64/crypto/aes-ce-ccm-*
that (AFAICT) has a similar goal of avoiding overhead by
combining the usual operations, so maybe the same can
be done here.

      Arnd