[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180718144050.GA2056@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 15:40:51 +0100
From: Ayan Halder <ayan.halder@....com>
To: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: liviu.dudau@....com, brian.starkey@....com, gustavo@...ovan.org,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, seanpaul@...omium.org,
airlied@...ux.ie, jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@...el.com,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, hjc@...k-chips.com,
heiko@...ech.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tomi.valkeinen@...com, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
sre@...nel.org, bparrot@...com, peter.ujfalusi@...com, afd@...com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, maxime.ripard@...tlin.com,
wens@...e.org, malidp@...s.arm.com, nd@....com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/sun4i: Substitute
sun4i_backend_format_is_yuv() with format->is_yuv
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 01:15:40PM +0300, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
Hi Ville,
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 06:13:46PM +0100, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
> > drm_format_info table has a field 'is_yuv' to denote if the format
> > is yuv or not. The driver is expected to use this instead of
> > having a function for the same purpose.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar halder <ayan.halder@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c | 12 +++---------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
> > index de0a76d..d7950b5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
> > @@ -86,12 +86,6 @@ static inline bool sun4i_backend_format_is_packed_yuv422(uint32_t format)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -static inline bool sun4i_backend_format_is_yuv(uint32_t format)
> > -{
> > - return sun4i_backend_format_is_planar_yuv(format) ||
> > - sun4i_backend_format_is_packed_yuv422(format);
> > -}
>
> sun4i_backend_format_is_planar_yuv() is now unused so could be nuked.
> Also the one remaining use of sun4i_backend_format_is_packed_yuv422()
> could be replaced with 'is_yuv && num_planes == 1', so that one could
> be easily killed off ass well.
I will have this in a separate patch.
> > -
> > static void sun4i_backend_apply_color_correction(struct sunxi_engine *engine)
> > {
> > int i;
> > @@ -304,7 +298,7 @@ int sun4i_backend_update_layer_formats(struct sun4i_backend *backend,
> > SUN4I_BACKEND_ATTCTL_REG0_LAY_GLBALPHA_EN,
> > val);
> >
> > - if (sun4i_backend_format_is_yuv(fb->format->format))
> > + if (fb->format->is_yuv)
> > return sun4i_backend_update_yuv_format(backend, layer, plane);
> >
> > ret = sun4i_backend_drm_format_to_layer(fb->format->format, &val);
> > @@ -384,7 +378,7 @@ int sun4i_backend_update_layer_buffer(struct sun4i_backend *backend,
> > */
> > paddr -= PHYS_OFFSET;
> >
> > - if (sun4i_backend_format_is_yuv(fb->format->format))
> > + if (fb->format->is_yuv)
> > return sun4i_backend_update_yuv_buffer(backend, fb, paddr);
> >
> > /* Write the 32 lower bits of the address (in bits) */
> > @@ -502,7 +496,7 @@ static int sun4i_backend_atomic_check(struct sunxi_engine *engine,
> > if (fb->format->has_alpha || (plane_state->alpha != DRM_BLEND_ALPHA_OPAQUE))
> > num_alpha_planes++;
> >
> > - if (sun4i_backend_format_is_yuv(fb->format->format)) {
> > + if (fb->format->is_yuv) {
> > DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Plane FB format is YUV\n");
> > num_yuv_planes++;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Ville Syrj?l?
> Intel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists