[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1531929711.3414.29.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 18:01:51 +0200
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mhillenb@...zon.de,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Make need_resched() return true when rcu_urgent_qs
requested
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 08:36 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> And I finally did get some near misses from an earlier commit, so we
> should consider your patch to be officially off the hook.
Yay, I like it when it's not my fault. I'll redo it with the ifdef
CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL.
What should it do for the !CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL case? The existing call in
guest_enter_irqoff() clearly wasn't actually doing the right thing
anyway, hence the need for the need_resched() patch in $SUBJECT... so
should I just leave it doing nothing in guest_enter_irqoff()?
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5213 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists