[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180718182359.GW2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 20:23:59 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc: songliubraving@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dave.hansen@...el.com, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86/mm/tlb: Make lazy TLB mode lazier
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 01:22:19PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Jul 18, 2018, at 12:00 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > Also, I don't suppose you've looked at the paravirt instances of
> > flush_tlb_other() ? They don't elide the flushes because of lazy.
>
> Let me look at those now :)
<snip xen>
> kvm_flush_tlb_other takes out preempted VCPUs from the flush mask,
> before calling native_flush_tlb_others, so it should get the optimization
> automatically.
Ah, ok. I wasn't entirely sure the new lazy was purely for the idle
case. But yes, the KVM paravirt thing should get the idle case right.
> Hyperv does ... sad magic.
Yeah,.. it got us to switch to 'rcu' freeing of page-tables and enabled
the kvm thing though, so that all is good :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists