linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RESEND] jffs2: use 64-bit intermediate timestamps

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <20180718202851.1011fb4e@bbrezillon>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jul 2018 20:28:51 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        y2038@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RESEND] jffs2: use 64-bit intermediate timestamps

On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 21:54:53 +0200
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 22:47:13 +0200
> Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> 
> > Am Freitag, 13. Juli 2018, 16:47:16 CEST schrieb Arnd Bergmann:  
> > > The VFS now uses timespec64 timestamps consistently, but jffs2 still
> > > converts them to 32-bit numbers on the storage medium. As the helper
> > > functions for the conversion (get_seconds() and timespec_to_timespec64())
> > > are now deprecated, let's change them over to the more modern
> > > replacements.
> > > 
> > > This keeps the traditional interpretation of those values, where
> > > the on-disk 32-bit numbers are taken to be negative numbers, i.e.
> > > dates before 1970, on 32-bit machines, but future numbers past 2038
> > > on 64-bit machines.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > > ---
> > > I originally sent these two patches on Jun 19, but got no reply aside
> > > from a harmless sparse warning reported by the kbuild test robot.
> > > 
> > > Looking at the git history for jffs2, it seems that David Woodhouse
> > > hasn't applied any patches for over two years, so I suppose he's
> > > not taking these either.
> > > 
> > > Al or Andrew, could you pick these up instead?    
> > 
> > We can carry it also via the MTD tree.  
> 
> I'll queue them to mtd/next.

Applied.

Thanks,

Boris

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Boris
> 
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives