[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180718175553.GA5532@raghu-VirtualBox>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:25:53 +0530
From: RAGHU H <raghuhack78@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, m=@...hu-VirtualBox,
Bart.VanAssche@....com
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pktcdvd:checkpatch:fix pointer declaration
Bart,
I'm starter in kernel contribution & I guess cleanup of certain files
which have more than 50+ checkpatch errors is good start.
Also one of the patch was accepted by Jens Axboe & he responded back to
resend one of the patch which was not getting applied.
But I get your point ,I'll restrict my checkpatch fixes to drivers/staging files
Thanks Joe for followup.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:43:11AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 18:06 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 21:28 +0530, RAGHU Halharvi wrote:
> > > * Fix all pointer declaration which causes
> > > "ERROR: "foo* bar" should be "foo *bar""
> >
> > Hello Raghu,
> >
> > If you would not be aware of this, checkpatch is a tool that is intended to
> > verify patches before submission and not to verify code that is already
> > upstream. A detailed explanation of why patches like this one should not be
> > submitted is available in "A quick guide to why stand-alone checkpatch
> > patches suck"
> > (https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/2014-September/012296.html).
>
> Read more of the whole thread.
> Varying opinions exist.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists