[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1a1d687-dfa4-e9cb-7216-67d458000234@axentia.se>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:01:46 +0200
From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
wsa@...-dreams.de, robh+dt@...nel.org, afaerber@...e.de
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
liuwei@...ions-semi.com, mp-cs@...ions-semi.com,
96boards@...obotics.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
andy.shevchenko@...il.com, daniel.thompson@...aro.org,
amit.kucheria@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hzhang@...obotics.com, bdong@...obotics.com,
manivannanece23@...il.com, thomas.liau@...ions-semi.com,
jeff.chen@...ions-semi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] i2c: Add Actions Semiconductor Owl family S900 I2C
driver
On 2018-07-01 19:23, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Add Actions Semiconductor Owl family S900 I2C driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 7 +
> drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c | 504 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 512 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> index 4f8df2ec87b1..8c8025f87ce4 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> @@ -762,6 +762,13 @@ config I2C_OMAP
> Like OMAP1510/1610/1710/5912 and OMAP242x.
> For details see http://www.ti.com/omap.
>
> +config I2C_OWL
> + tristate "Actions Semiconductor Owl I2C Controller"
> + depends on ARCH_ACTIONS || COMPILE_TEST
> + help
> + Say Y here if you want to use the I2C bus controller on
> + the Actions Semiconductor Owl SoC's.
> +
> config I2C_PASEMI
> tristate "PA Semi SMBus interface"
> depends on PPC_PASEMI && PCI
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
> index 5a869144a0c5..b71618f77880 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_MXS) += i2c-mxs.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_NOMADIK) += i2c-nomadik.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_OCORES) += i2c-ocores.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_OMAP) += i2c-omap.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_OWL) += i2c-owl.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_PASEMI) += i2c-pasemi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_PCA_PLATFORM) += i2c-pca-platform.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_PMCMSP) += i2c-pmcmsp.o
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..580f8d092302
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,504 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
The preferred spelling is GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Actions Semiconductor Owl SoC's I2C driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2014 Actions Semi Inc.
> + * Author: David Liu <liuwei@...ions-semi.com>
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2018 Linaro Ltd.
> + * Author: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +
> +/* I2C registers */
> +#define OWL_I2C_REG_CTL 0x0000
> +#define OWL_I2C_REG_CLKDIV 0x0004
> +#define OWL_I2C_REG_STAT 0x0008
> +#define OWL_I2C_REG_ADDR 0x000C
> +#define OWL_I2C_REG_TXDAT 0x0010
> +#define OWL_I2C_REG_RXDAT 0x0014
> +#define OWL_I2C_REG_CMD 0x0018
> +#define OWL_I2C_REG_FIFOCTL 0x001C
> +#define OWL_I2C_REG_FIFOSTAT 0x0020
> +#define OWL_I2C_REG_DATCNT 0x0024
> +#define OWL_I2C_REG_RCNT 0x0028
> +
> +/* I2Cx_CTL Bit Mask */
> +#define OWL_I2C_CTL_RB BIT(1)
> +#define OWL_I2C_CTL_GBCC(x) (((x) & 0x3) << 2)
> +#define OWL_I2C_CTL_GBCC_NONE OWL_I2C_CTL_GBCC(0)
> +#define OWL_I2C_CTL_GBCC_START OWL_I2C_CTL_GBCC(1)
> +#define OWL_I2C_CTL_GBCC_STOP OWL_I2C_CTL_GBCC(2)
> +#define OWL_I2C_CTL_GBCC_RSTART OWL_I2C_CTL_GBCC(3)
> +#define OWL_I2C_CTL_IRQE BIT(5)
> +#define OWL_I2C_CTL_EN BIT(7)
> +#define OWL_I2C_CTL_AE BIT(8)
> +#define OWL_I2C_CTL_SHSM BIT(10)
> +
> +#define OWL_I2C_DIV_FACTOR(x) ((x) & 0xff)
> +
> +/* I2Cx_STAT Bit Mask */
> +#define OWL_I2C_STAT_RACK BIT(0)
> +#define OWL_I2C_STAT_BEB BIT(1)
> +#define OWL_I2C_STAT_IRQP BIT(2)
> +#define OWL_I2C_STAT_LAB BIT(3)
> +#define OWL_I2C_STAT_STPD BIT(4)
> +#define OWL_I2C_STAT_STAD BIT(5)
> +#define OWL_I2C_STAT_BBB BIT(6)
> +#define OWL_I2C_STAT_TCB BIT(7)
> +#define OWL_I2C_STAT_LBST BIT(8)
> +#define OWL_I2C_STAT_SAMB BIT(9)
> +#define OWL_I2C_STAT_SRGC BIT(10)
> +
> +/* I2Cx_CMD Bit Mask */
> +#define OWL_I2C_CMD_SBE BIT(0)
> +#define OWL_I2C_CMD_RBE BIT(4)
> +#define OWL_I2C_CMD_DE BIT(8)
> +#define OWL_I2C_CMD_NS BIT(9)
> +#define OWL_I2C_CMD_SE BIT(10)
> +#define OWL_I2C_CMD_MSS BIT(11)
> +#define OWL_I2C_CMD_WRS BIT(12)
> +#define OWL_I2C_CMD_SECL BIT(15)
> +
> +#define OWL_I2C_CMD_AS(x) (((x) & 0x7) << 1)
> +#define OWL_I2C_CMD_SAS(x) (((x) & 0x7) << 5)
> +
> +/* I2Cx_FIFOCTL Bit Mask */
> +#define OWL_I2C_FIFOCTL_NIB BIT(0)
> +#define OWL_I2C_FIFOCTL_RFR BIT(1)
> +#define OWL_I2C_FIFOCTL_TFR BIT(2)
> +
> +/* I2Cc_FIFOSTAT Bit Mask */
> +#define OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_RNB BIT(1)
> +#define OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_RFE BIT(2)
> +#define OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_TFF BIT(5)
> +#define OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_TFD GENMASK(23, 16)
> +#define OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_RFD GENMASK(15, 8)
> +
> +/* I2C bus timeout */
> +#define OWL_I2C_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(4 * 1000)
> +
> +#define OWL_I2C_MAX_RETRIES 50
> +
> +#define OWL_I2C_DEF_SPEED_HZ 100000
> +#define OWL_I2C_MAX_SPEED_HZ 400000
> +
> +struct owl_i2c_dev {
> + struct i2c_adapter adap;
> + struct i2c_msg *msg;
> + struct completion msg_complete;
> + struct clk *clk;
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + void __iomem *base;
> + unsigned long clk_rate;
> + u32 bus_freq;
> + u32 msg_ptr;
> +};
> +
> +static void owl_i2c_update_reg(void __iomem *reg, unsigned int val, bool state)
> +{
> + unsigned int regval;
> +
> + regval = readl(reg);
> +
> + if (state)
> + regval |= val;
> + else
> + regval &= ~val;
> +
> + writel(regval, reg);
> +}
> +
> +static void owl_i2c_reset(struct owl_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> +{
> + owl_i2c_update_reg(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_CTL,
> + OWL_I2C_CTL_EN, false);
> + mdelay(1);
> + owl_i2c_update_reg(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_CTL,
> + OWL_I2C_CTL_EN, true);
> +
> + /* Clear status registers */
> + writel(0, i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_STAT);
> +}
> +
> +static int owl_i2c_reset_fifo(struct owl_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> +{
> + unsigned int val, timeout = 0;
> +
> + /* Reset FIFO */
> + owl_i2c_update_reg(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_FIFOCTL,
> + OWL_I2C_FIFOCTL_RFR | OWL_I2C_FIFOCTL_TFR,
> + true);
> +
> + /* Wait 50ms for FIFO reset complete */
> + do {
> + val = readl(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_FIFOCTL);
> + if (!(val & (OWL_I2C_FIFOCTL_RFR | OWL_I2C_FIFOCTL_TFR)))
> + break;
> + usleep_range(500, 1000);
> + } while (timeout++ < OWL_I2C_MAX_RETRIES);
> +
> + if (timeout > OWL_I2C_MAX_RETRIES) {
> + dev_err(&i2c_dev->adap.dev, "FIFO reset timeout");
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void owl_i2c_set_freq(struct owl_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> +{
> + unsigned int val;
> +
> + val = DIV_ROUND_UP(i2c_dev->clk_rate, i2c_dev->bus_freq * 16);
> +
> + /* Set clock divider factor */
> + writel(OWL_I2C_DIV_FACTOR(val), i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_CLKDIV);
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t owl_i2c_interrupt(int irq, void *_dev)
> +{
> + struct owl_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = _dev;
> + struct i2c_msg *msg = i2c_dev->msg;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + unsigned int stat, fifostat;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c_dev->lock, flags);
> +
> + fifostat = readl(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_FIFOSTAT);
> + if (fifostat & OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_RNB) {
> + dev_dbg(&i2c_dev->adap.dev, "received NACK from device");
> + goto stop;
> + }
> +
> + stat = readl(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_STAT);
> + if (stat & OWL_I2C_STAT_BEB) {
> + dev_dbg(&i2c_dev->adap.dev, "bus error");
> + goto stop;
> + }
> +
> + /* Handle FIFO read */
> + if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) {
> + while ((readl(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_FIFOSTAT) &
> + OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_RFE) &&
> + (i2c_dev->msg_ptr < msg->len)) {
This is poorly aligned and has some () that at least I do not need.
I would write
while ((readl(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_FIFOSTAT) &
OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_RFE) &&
i2c_dev->msg_ptr < msg->len) {
so that the two sides of the binary operators align.
> + msg->buf[i2c_dev->msg_ptr++] = readl(i2c_dev->base +
> + OWL_I2C_REG_RXDAT);
> + }
> + } else {
> + /* Handle the remaining bytes which were not sent */
> + while (!(readl(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_FIFOSTAT) &
> + OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_TFF) &&
> + i2c_dev->msg_ptr < msg->len) {
> + writel(msg->buf[i2c_dev->msg_ptr++], i2c_dev->base +
> + OWL_I2C_REG_TXDAT);
Here is another example of poor white-space. I would write:
writel(msg->buf[i2c_dev->msg_ptr++],
i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_TXDAT);
In general, I think you should have a look at most if not all your
multi-line statements, and make use of spaces so that things align
better vertically.
> + }
> + }
> +
> +stop:
> + /* Clear pending interrupts */
> + owl_i2c_update_reg(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_STAT,
> + OWL_I2C_STAT_IRQP, true);
E.g. here. Make the OWL... argument align with i2c_dev->...
owl_i2c_update_reg(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_STAT,
OWL_I2C_STAT_IRQP, true);
It really does look neater.
> +
> + complete_all(&i2c_dev->msg_complete);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c_dev->lock, flags);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 owl_i2c_func(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
> +{
> + return I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL;
> +}
> +
> +static int owl_i2c_check_bus_busy(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
> +{
> + struct owl_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
> + unsigned long timeout;
> +
> + /* Check for Bus busy */
> + timeout = jiffies + OWL_I2C_TIMEOUT;
> + while (readl(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_STAT) & OWL_I2C_STAT_BBB) {
> + if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
> + dev_err(&adap->dev, "Bus busy timeout");
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int owl_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
> + int num)
> +{
> + struct owl_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
> + struct i2c_msg *msg;
> + unsigned long time_left, flags;
> + unsigned int i2c_cmd, val;
> + unsigned int addr;
> + int ret, idx;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c_dev->lock, flags);
> +
> + /* Reset I2C controller */
> + owl_i2c_reset(i2c_dev);
> +
> + /* Set bus frequency */
> + owl_i2c_set_freq(i2c_dev);
> +
> + /*
> + * Spinlock should be released before calling reset FIFO and
> + * bus busy check since those functions may sleep
> + */
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c_dev->lock, flags);
> +
> + /* Reset FIFO */
> + ret = owl_i2c_reset_fifo(i2c_dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + /* Disable I2C controller */
> + owl_i2c_update_reg(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_CTL,
> + OWL_I2C_CTL_EN, false);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* Check for bus busy */
> + ret = owl_i2c_check_bus_busy(adap);
> + if (ret) {
> + /* Disable I2C controller */
> + owl_i2c_update_reg(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_CTL,
> + OWL_I2C_CTL_EN, false);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c_dev->lock, flags);
> +
> + /* Check for Arbitration lost */
> + val = readl(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_STAT);
> + if (val & OWL_I2C_STAT_LAB) {
> + val &= ~OWL_I2C_STAT_LAB;
> + writel(val, i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_STAT);
> + ret = -EAGAIN;
> + goto err_exit;
> + }
> +
> + reinit_completion(&i2c_dev->msg_complete);
> +
> + /* Enable I2C controller interrupt */
> + owl_i2c_update_reg(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_CTL,
> + OWL_I2C_CTL_IRQE, true);
> +
> + /*
> + * Select: FIFO enable, Master mode, Stop enable, Data count enable,
> + * Send start bit
> + */
> + i2c_cmd = (OWL_I2C_CMD_SECL | OWL_I2C_CMD_MSS | OWL_I2C_CMD_SE
> + | OWL_I2C_CMD_NS | OWL_I2C_CMD_DE | OWL_I2C_CMD_SBE);
The operator is customarily on the first line, and the () are not needed.
And I would throw in a couple of extra spaces for readability. Like so:
i2c_cmd = OWL_I2C_CMD_SECL | OWL_I2C_CMD_MSS | OWL_I2C_CMD_SE |
OWL_I2C_CMD_NS | OWL_I2C_CMD_DE | OWL_I2C_CMD_SBE;
> +
> + /* Handle repeated start condition */
> + if (num > 1) {
> + /* Set internal address length and enable repeated start */
> + i2c_cmd |= (OWL_I2C_CMD_AS(msgs[0].len + 1)
> + | OWL_I2C_CMD_SAS(1) | OWL_I2C_CMD_RBE);
Spurious ()
> +
> + /* Write slave address */
> + addr = i2c_8bit_addr_from_msg(&msgs[0]);
> + writel(addr, i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_TXDAT);
> +
> + /* Write internal register address */
> + for (idx = 0; idx < msgs[0].len; idx++)
> + writel(msgs[0].buf[idx], i2c_dev->base +
> + OWL_I2C_REG_TXDAT);
> +
> + msg = &msgs[1];
> + } else {
> + /* Set address length */
> + i2c_cmd |= OWL_I2C_CMD_AS(1);
> + msg = &msgs[0];
> + }
> +
> + i2c_dev->msg = msg;
> + i2c_dev->msg_ptr = 0;
> +
> + /* Set data count for the message */
> + writel(msg->len, i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_DATCNT);
> +
> + addr = i2c_8bit_addr_from_msg(msg);
> + writel(addr, i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_TXDAT);
> +
> + if (!(msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)) {
> + /* Write data to FIFO */
> + for (idx = 0; idx < msg->len; idx++) {
> + /* Check for FIFO full */
> + if (readl(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_FIFOSTAT)
> + & OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_TFF)
Operator should be on the first line (and align, but as I said that goes
for virtually every multi-line statement in the whole file).
> + break;
> +
> + writel(msg->buf[idx],
> + i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_TXDAT);
> + }
> +
> + i2c_dev->msg_ptr = idx;
> + }
> +
> + /* Ignore the NACK if needed */
> + if (msg->flags & I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK)
> + owl_i2c_update_reg(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_FIFOCTL,
> + OWL_I2C_FIFOCTL_NIB, true);
> + else
> + owl_i2c_update_reg(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_FIFOCTL,
> + OWL_I2C_FIFOCTL_NIB, false);
> +
> + /* Start the transfer */
> + writel(i2c_cmd, i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_CMD);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c_dev->lock, flags);
> +
> + time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->msg_complete,
> + adap->timeout);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c_dev->lock, flags);
> + if (time_left == 0) {
> + dev_err(&adap->dev, "Transaction timed out");
> + /* Send stop condition and release the bus */
> + owl_i2c_update_reg(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_CTL,
> + OWL_I2C_CTL_GBCC_STOP | OWL_I2C_CTL_RB, true);
> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + goto err_exit;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Here, -ENXIO will be returned if interrupt occurred but no
> + * read or write happened. Else if msg_ptr equals to message length,
> + * message count will be returned.
> + */
> + ret = (i2c_dev->msg_ptr == msg->len) ? num : -ENXIO;
Consider killing the ().
> +
> +err_exit:
> +
> + /* Disable I2C controller */
> + owl_i2c_update_reg(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_CTL,
> + OWL_I2C_CTL_EN, false);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c_dev->lock, flags);
AFAICT, the ordering of these two statements do not matter. So you could
unlock first and then disable the controller. Then you could have an
unlocked_err_exit label (or something) that you could jump to when things
go south in unlocked regions above, and thus have common error handling.
I.e.
err_exit:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c_dev->lock, flags);
unlocked_err_exit:
/* Disable I2C controller */
owl_i2c_update_reg(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_CTL,
OWL_I2C_CTL_EN, false);
If the ordering actually matters, then I think you have a problem if either
of the unlocked owl_i2c_reset_fifo() or owl_i2c_check_bus_busy() fails above.
But as I said, I don't think the ordering matters...
But all this is stylistic nits. It's not my code and I don't care deeply.
Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct i2c_algorithm owl_i2c_algorithm = {
> + .master_xfer = owl_i2c_master_xfer,
> + .functionality = owl_i2c_func,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct i2c_adapter_quirks owl_i2c_quirks = {
> + .flags = I2C_AQ_COMB | I2C_AQ_COMB_WRITE_FIRST,
> + .max_read_len = 240,
> + .max_write_len = 240,
> + .max_comb_1st_msg_len = 6,
> + .max_comb_2nd_msg_len = 240,
> +};
> +
> +static int owl_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct owl_i2c_dev *i2c_dev;
> + struct resource *res;
> + int ret, irq;
> +
> + i2c_dev = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*i2c_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!i2c_dev)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + i2c_dev->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> + if (IS_ERR(i2c_dev->base))
> + return PTR_ERR(i2c_dev->base);
> +
> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (irq < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get IRQ number\n");
> + return irq;
> + }
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "clock-frequency",
> + &i2c_dev->bus_freq))
> + i2c_dev->bus_freq = OWL_I2C_DEF_SPEED_HZ;
> +
> + /* We support only frequencies of 100k and 400k for now */
> + if (i2c_dev->bus_freq != OWL_I2C_DEF_SPEED_HZ &&
> + i2c_dev->bus_freq != OWL_I2C_MAX_SPEED_HZ) {
> + dev_err(dev, "invalid clock-frequency %d\n", i2c_dev->bus_freq);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + i2c_dev->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(i2c_dev->clk)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get clock\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(i2c_dev->clk);
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(i2c_dev->clk);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + i2c_dev->clk_rate = clk_get_rate(i2c_dev->clk);
> + if (!i2c_dev->clk_rate) {
> + dev_err(dev, "input clock rate should not be zero\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto disable_clk;
> + }
> +
> + init_completion(&i2c_dev->msg_complete);
> + spin_lock_init(&i2c_dev->lock);
> + i2c_dev->adap.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + i2c_dev->adap.algo = &owl_i2c_algorithm;
> + i2c_dev->adap.timeout = OWL_I2C_TIMEOUT;
> + i2c_dev->adap.quirks = &owl_i2c_quirks;
> + i2c_dev->adap.dev.parent = dev;
> + i2c_dev->adap.dev.of_node = dev->of_node;
> + snprintf(i2c_dev->adap.name, sizeof(i2c_dev->adap.name),
> + "%s", "OWL I2C adapter");
> + i2c_set_adapdata(&i2c_dev->adap, i2c_dev);
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, i2c_dev);
> +
> + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, owl_i2c_interrupt, 0, pdev->name,
> + i2c_dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to request irq %d\n", irq);
> + goto disable_clk;
> + }
> +
> + return i2c_add_adapter(&i2c_dev->adap);
> +
> +disable_clk:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(i2c_dev->clk);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id owl_i2c_of_match[] = {
> + {.compatible = "actions,s900-i2c"},
> + { /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, owl_i2c_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver owl_i2c_driver = {
> + .probe = owl_i2c_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "owl-i2c",
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(owl_i2c_of_match),
> + },
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(owl_i2c_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("David Liu <liuwei@...ions-semi.com>");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Actions Semiconductor Owl SoC's I2C driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists