linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: tegra: apalis-tk1: Fix SPDX license identifier format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJKOXPfKunyOqYA8vNjN71K92=FW4vcTjdcz9TQ8mHdFJL7VKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:53:55 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        "stefan@...er.ch" <stefan@...er.ch>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dev@...xeye.de" <dev@...xeye.de>,
        "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        "pombredanne@...b.com" <pombredanne@...b.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: tegra: apalis-tk1: Fix SPDX license identifier format

On 18 July 2018 at 22:37, Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 21:48 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Fix incorrect format used for OR clause in SPDX license identifier.
>
> Can you please elaborate how you got to that conclusion as there are
> various other device trees having it specified the exact same way. Plus
> I was actually even in discussion with Philippe on that patch set back
> when I introduced those.

Hi,

I thought these were pointed by checkpatch but it was my mistake -
checkpatch complained about missing SPDX in tegra124-apalis.dtsi, not
about these files. Maybe I was mislead by the in-kernel example [1]...
although SPDX specification uses them so I think this patch can be
abandoned.

[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.18-rc5/source/Documentation/process/license-rules.rst#L130

Best regards,
Krzysztof