linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/pti: check the return value of pti_user_pagetable_walk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1807191225230.1602@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:29:09 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Jiang Biao <jiang.biao2@....com.cn>
cc:     mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, albcamus@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhong.weidong@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/pti: check the return value of
 pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d

On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, Jiang Biao wrote:

> pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d() may return NULL, we should check the
> return value to avoid NULL pointer dereference. And add warning
> for fail allocation where NULL returned.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Biao <jiang.biao2@....com.cn>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/pti.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pti.c b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
> index 4d418e7..5c33a16 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static p4d_t *pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d(unsigned long address)
>  
>  	if (pgd_none(*pgd)) {
>  		unsigned long new_p4d_page = __get_free_page(gfp);
> -		if (!new_p4d_page)
> +		if (WARN_ON(!new_p4d_page))

WARN_ON_ONCE() please

>  			return NULL;
>  
>  		set_pgd(pgd, __pgd(_KERNPG_TABLE | __pa(new_p4d_page)));
> @@ -195,9 +195,12 @@ static p4d_t *pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d(unsigned long address)
>  static pmd_t *pti_user_pagetable_walk_pmd(unsigned long address)
>  {
>  	gfp_t gfp = (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOTRACK | __GFP_ZERO);
> -	p4d_t *p4d = pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d(address);
>  	pud_t *pud;
>  
> +	p4d_t *p4d = pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d(address);

No. This really is not how it should be done.

  	gfp_t gfp = (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOTRACK | __GFP_ZERO);
-	p4d_t *p4d = pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d(address);
+	p4d_t *p4d;
  	pud_t *pud;

+	p4d = pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d(address);
+	if (!p4d)
+		return NULL;

Ditto for patch 2/2.

>  	BUILD_BUG_ON(p4d_large(*p4d) != 0);
>  	if (p4d_none(*p4d)) {
>  		unsigned long new_pud_page = __get_free_page(gfp);
> @@ -354,6 +357,9 @@ static void __init pti_clone_p4d(unsigned long addr)
>  	pgd_t *kernel_pgd;
>  
>  	user_p4d = pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d(addr);
> +	if (!user_p4d)
> +		return;	
> +
>  	kernel_pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
>  	kernel_p4d = p4d_offset(kernel_pgd, addr);
>  	*user_p4d = *kernel_p4d;

Aside of that the patch has trailing white space in 2 places. Please take
the patch and apply it to your git tree localy before submitting it.

Thanks,

	tglx