[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180719022325.GA2773@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:23:25 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, dhowells@...hat.com,
vgoyal@...hat.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
davem@...emloft.net, bhe@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, bhsharma@...hat.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 03/15] powerpc, kexec_file: factor out memblock-based
arch_kexec_walk_mem()
Hi James,
On 07/18/18 at 05:52pm, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Dave, Akashi,
>
> On 16/07/18 13:26, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 07/11/18 at 04:41pm, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >> Memblock list is another source for usable system memory layout.
> >> So powerpc's arch_kexec_walk_mem() is moved to kexec_file.c so that
> >> other memblock-based architectures, particularly arm64, can also utilise
> >> it. A moved function is now renamed to kexec_walk_memblock() and merged
> >> into the existing arch_kexec_walk_mem() for general use, either resource
> >> list or memblock list.
> >>
> >> A consequent function will not work for kdump with memblock list, but
> >> this will be fixed in the next patch.
> >
> > If this breaks something, then it would be good to fold the following
> > patch in this patch so that bisect can still work?
>
> This patch is just moving code from arch/powerpc that is generic.
> powerpc doesn't support kdump via kexec_file, so nothing is damaged by adding
> this new code in the next patch.
>
> arm64 would need this kdump support, but it doesn't use it until patch 11.
Ok, then I'm fine with it, thanks for the explanation.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
Thanks
Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists