| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 13:04:18 +0200
From: Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@...e.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Commit 554c8aa8ecad causing severe performance degression with
pcc-cpufreq
For the sake of completeness following are given the remaining sets of
kernbench results related to this thread.
Setup for kernbench test is as described in previous mails but now all
120 logical CPUs were online in all tests. Test runs were still pinned
to node 0.
Common legend for below tables is:
OSCM: "OS Control Mode"
DPSM: "Dynamic Power Savings Mode"
idle_rb: partial rollback of 554c8aa8ecad ("sched: idle: Select idle
state before stopping the tick") as described in initial mail
of this thread
(A) intel_pstate (in powersave mode) performance wrt effect of commit
554c8aa8ecad and wrt to potential interference from platform code
Kernel v4.18-rc5-36-g30b06abfb92b + patch for intel_pstate to load it
instead of pcc-cpufreq when system is in DPSM.
Detailed results for each number of compile jobs:
(OSCM is baseline, values in parenthesis show comparison to baseline)
OSCM OSCM DPSM DPSM
idle_rb idle_rb
Amean user-2 600.58 596.38 ( 0.70%) 685.94 ( -14.21%) 688.78 ( -14.69%)
Amean user-4 583.90 586.34 ( -0.42%) 626.37 ( -7.27%) 622.17 ( -6.55%)
Amean user-8 584.78 581.52 ( 0.56%) 600.89 ( -2.75%) 595.53 ( -1.84%)
Amean user-16 705.07 688.62 ( 2.33%) 705.16 ( -0.01%) 682.44 ( 3.21%)
Amean user-30 1017.25 1022.39 ( -0.51%) 1025.23 ( -0.78%) 1022.61 ( -0.53%)
Amean syst-2 172.17 174.08 ( -1.11%) 184.73 ( -7.30%) 186.13 ( -8.11%)
Amean syst-4 183.88 180.44 ( 1.87%) 191.70 ( -4.25%) 192.24 ( -4.54%)
Amean syst-8 193.40 193.81 ( -0.21%) 198.01 ( -2.38%) 193.96 ( -0.29%)
Amean syst-16 183.97 180.40 ( 1.94%) 184.00 ( -0.01%) 182.10 ( 1.02%)
Amean syst-30 122.36 122.08 ( 0.23%) 122.53 ( -0.14%) 122.17 ( 0.15%)
Amean elsp-2 610.90 634.64 ( -3.89%) 667.67 ( -9.29%) 661.81 ( -8.33%)
Amean elsp-4 413.54 488.02 ( -18.01%) 433.79 ( -4.90%) 407.30 ( 1.51%)
Amean elsp-8 261.85 218.25 ( 16.65%) 246.62 ( 5.82%) 219.55 ( 16.15%)
Amean elsp-16 89.27 99.36 ( -11.30%) 92.74 ( -3.89%) 102.74 ( -15.09%)
Amean elsp-30 47.07 47.04 ( 0.08%) 48.82 ( -3.72%) 48.28 ( -2.57%)
Stddev user-2 6.06 7.53 ( -24.21%) 31.88 (-425.98%) 25.79 (-325.57%)
Stddev user-4 7.05 14.48 (-105.40%) 11.82 ( -67.63%) 12.14 ( -72.22%)
Stddev user-8 5.69 1.18 ( 79.28%) 18.75 (-229.45%) 7.03 ( -23.51%)
Stddev user-16 6.41 15.74 (-145.55%) 12.87 (-100.75%) 10.59 ( -65.19%)
Stddev user-30 2.62 2.80 ( -6.56%) 2.92 ( -11.31%) 2.45 ( 6.52%)
Stddev syst-2 3.48 2.81 ( 19.28%) 2.27 ( 34.73%) 1.47 ( 57.83%)
Stddev syst-4 4.04 4.69 ( -16.03%) 2.16 ( 46.42%) 0.84 ( 79.32%)
Stddev syst-8 3.96 1.42 ( 64.11%) 2.34 ( 40.98%) 1.93 ( 51.24%)
Stddev syst-16 2.01 2.33 ( -15.76%) 1.33 ( 33.89%) 1.94 ( 3.74%)
Stddev syst-30 0.76 0.38 ( 50.10%) 0.91 ( -19.48%) 0.17 ( 77.86%)
Stddev elsp-2 44.55 58.37 ( -31.01%) 110.11 (-147.15%) 82.81 ( -85.88%)
Stddev elsp-4 62.39 109.75 ( -75.90%) 48.32 ( 22.56%) 47.10 ( 24.52%)
Stddev elsp-8 59.01 25.95 ( 56.02%) 71.44 ( -21.07%) 37.83 ( 35.89%)
Stddev elsp-16 10.47 23.88 (-128.08%) 11.98 ( -14.41%) 15.42 ( -47.32%)
Stddev elsp-30 0.26 0.64 (-142.06%) 0.39 ( -46.53%) 0.44 ( -66.71%)
Overall test time:
OSCM OSCM DPSM DPSM
idle_rb idle_rb
User 18681.59 18599.99 19450.38 19289.33
System 4487.76 4458.55 4620.80 4595.13
Elapsed 7407.07 7725.86 7765.91 7502.72
Overall test run-time is comparable. Commit 554c8aa8ecad does not
seem to have a significant impact on performance (I don't have
numbers for power consumption). Comparing OSCM vs. DPSM: it seems
that its better to switch system into OSCM.
(B) performance of intel_pstate (in powersave mode and system in DPSM)
vs. pcc-cpufreq (with ondemand governor)
Results for pcc-cpufreq were obtained with v4.17.5+misc modifications.
intel_pstate results were obtained with v4.18-rc5-36-g30b06abfb92b +
patch for intel_pstate to load it instead of pcc-cpufreq when system
is in DPSM.
So strictly speaking this is no correct comparison but at least it
gives an idea where the limits are with pcc-cpufreq and why its
better to just switch to intel_pstate.
pcc-cpufreq driver modifications were
freqtable: pcc-cpufreq modified to use fixed table of 4 frequencies
deadband: pcc-cpufreq modified to re-introduce so called deadband
effect which keeps CPU at minimum frequency if target
frequency would be in the calculated deadband
intel_pstate pcc-cpufreq pcc-cpufreq pcc-cpufreq
DPSM idle_rb idle_rb+freqtable idle_rb+deadband
Amean user-2 685.94 834.15 ( -21.61%) 648.68 ( 5.43%) 636.63 ( 7.19%)
Amean user-4 626.37 902.09 ( -44.02%) 657.43 ( -4.96%) 615.49 ( 1.74%)
Amean user-8 600.89 1078.37 ( -79.46%) 723.05 ( -20.33%) 646.23 ( -7.55%)
Amean user-16 705.16 1640.89 (-132.70%) 1096.61 ( -55.51%) 904.17 ( -28.22%)
Amean user-30 1025.23 1463.90 ( -42.79%) 1156.17 ( -12.77%) 1151.40 ( -12.31%)
Amean syst-2 184.73 232.17 ( -25.68%) 178.24 ( 3.51%) 172.09 ( 6.84%)
Amean syst-4 191.70 257.22 ( -34.18%) 194.16 ( -1.29%) 188.10 ( 1.88%)
Amean syst-8 198.01 313.67 ( -58.41%) 228.34 ( -15.31%) 206.99 ( -4.53%)
Amean syst-16 184.00 393.92 (-114.09%) 279.89 ( -52.12%) 241.83 ( -31.43%)
Amean syst-30 122.53 185.98 ( -51.79%) 143.28 ( -16.94%) 140.45 ( -14.62%)
Amean elsp-2 667.67 769.28 ( -15.22%) 635.68 ( 4.79%) 651.51 ( 2.42%)
Amean elsp-4 433.79 614.27 ( -41.60%) 440.45 ( -1.53%) 392.80 ( 9.45%)
Amean elsp-8 246.62 397.54 ( -61.19%) 252.27 ( -2.29%) 239.21 ( 3.01%)
Amean elsp-16 92.74 207.43 (-123.68%) 138.00 ( -48.81%) 119.98 ( -29.37%)
Amean elsp-30 48.82 72.66 ( -48.83%) 55.95 ( -14.60%) 54.32 ( -11.27%)
Stddev user-2 31.88 15.22 ( 52.26%) 7.77 ( 75.63%) 6.63 ( 79.21%)
Stddev user-4 11.82 32.20 (-172.49%) 3.37 ( 71.44%) 6.44 ( 45.49%)
Stddev user-8 18.75 33.99 ( -81.29%) 6.96 ( 62.86%) 5.82 ( 68.97%)
Stddev user-16 12.87 70.72 (-449.46%) 31.19 (-142.30%) 28.88 (-124.40%)
Stddev user-30 2.92 26.08 (-792.64%) 6.16 (-110.99%) 10.90 (-273.16%)
Stddev syst-2 2.27 4.44 ( -95.54%) 4.15 ( -82.48%) 2.09 ( 8.11%)
Stddev syst-4 2.16 8.46 (-290.74%) 3.71 ( -71.58%) 2.45 ( -12.99%)
Stddev syst-8 2.34 10.73 (-359.70%) 3.98 ( -70.62%) 4.39 ( -87.80%)
Stddev syst-16 1.33 11.44 (-759.46%) 2.14 ( -60.49%) 2.93 (-120.24%)
Stddev syst-30 0.91 4.88 (-436.79%) 1.37 ( -50.11%) 2.36 (-159.71%)
Stddev elsp-2 110.11 85.53 ( 22.32%) 87.11 ( 20.89%) 37.33 ( 66.10%)
Stddev elsp-4 48.32 130.17 (-169.39%) 59.81 ( -23.79%) 26.15 ( 45.88%)
Stddev elsp-8 71.44 86.47 ( -21.03%) 12.87 ( 81.98%) 43.88 ( 38.58%)
Stddev elsp-16 11.98 13.63 ( -13.82%) 8.94 ( 25.35%) 5.97 ( 50.15%)
Stddev elsp-30 0.39 2.64 (-582.23%) 0.62 ( -58.97%) 0.95 (-144.47%)
intel_pstate pcc-cpufreq pcc-cpufreq pcc-cpufreq
DPSM idle_rb idle_rb+ idle_rb+
freqtable deadband
User 19450.38 31273.96 22689.14 21050.35
System 4620.80 7327.67 5364.63 4984.36
Elapsed 7765.91 10997.49 7935.53 7593.74
Again I have no numbers for power consumption.
Note that I've stopped an attempt to collect results for pcc-cpufreq
with unmodififed v4.17.5 (ie. w/o idle_rb) after the first iteration
(compiling kernel with 2 jobs) took several hours.
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists