lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180719132512.GA27938@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:25:12 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc:     Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] spi multi chipselect support

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 07:19:19PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:

> My preferred solution would to have something like
> i2c_new_secondary_device(), but for SPI. This way the driver that binds to
> the compatible string can allocate devices for additional chip selects as
> necessary. Also make use of the reg-names property the same way as in I2C.

Yes, that's at least the most consistent way forwards if nothing else.
I don't really have any more appealing ideas anyway.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ