[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180719132512.GA27938@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:25:12 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] spi multi chipselect support
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 07:19:19PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> My preferred solution would to have something like
> i2c_new_secondary_device(), but for SPI. This way the driver that binds to
> the compatible string can allocate devices for additional chip selects as
> necessary. Also make use of the reg-names property the same way as in I2C.
Yes, that's at least the most consistent way forwards if nothing else.
I don't really have any more appealing ideas anyway.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists