[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25e4f647-f830-e1cc-bffc-0cc894885667@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:49:55 -0500
From: "Alex G." <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>
To: Tal Gilboa <talgi@...lanox.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, alex_gagniuc@...lteam.com,
austin_bolen@...l.com, shyam_iyer@...l.com, keith.busch@...el.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Ariel Elior <ariel.elior@...ium.com>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
Ganesh Goudar <ganeshgr@...lsio.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: Check for PCIe downtraining conditions
On 07/18/2018 08:38 AM, Tal Gilboa wrote:
> On 7/16/2018 5:17 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> [+cc maintainers of drivers that already use pcie_print_link_status()
>> and GPU folks]
[snip]
>>
>>> + /* Multi-function PCIe share the same link/status. */
>>> + if ((PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn) != 0) || dev->is_virtfn)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + pcie_print_link_status(dev);
>>> +}
>
> Is this function called by default for every PCIe device? What about
> VFs? We make an exception for them on our driver since a VF doesn't have
> access to the needed information in order to provide a meaningful message.
I'm assuming VF means virtual function. pcie_print_link_status() doesn't
care if it's passed a virtual function. It will try to do its job.
That's why I bail out three lines above, with 'dev->is_virtfn' check.
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists