[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4295075b-8a0f-1723-2e80-1bbd2f038846@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 11:58:41 -0400
From: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: steven.sistare@...cle.com, daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, john.stultz@...aro.org,
sboyd@...eaurora.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com,
prarit@...hat.com, feng.tang@...el.com, pmladek@...e.com,
gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 20/25] x86/tsc: calibrate tsc only once
On 07/19/2018 07:01 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:22:06PM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
>>> During boot tsc is calibrated twice: once in tsc_early_delay_calibrate(),
>>> and the second time in tsc_init().
>>>
>>> Rename tsc_early_delay_calibrate() to tsc_early_init(), and rework it so
>>> the calibration is done only early, and make tsc_init() to use the values
>>> already determined in tsc_early_init().
>>>
>>> Sometimes it is not possible to determine tsc early, as the subsystem that
>>> is required is not yet initialized, in such case try again later in
>>> tsc_init().
>>
>> It might be nice to preserve some of the information tglx dug out during
>> review of all this. Like the various methods of calibrate_*() and their
>> dependencies.
>>
>> And I note that this patch relies on the magic of native_calibrate_cpu()
>> working really early and not exploding in the quick calibration run.
>> This either wants fixing or documenting.
>>
>> I think the initial idea was to only do the fast_calibrate (cpuid, msr
>> and possibly the quick_pit) things early and delay the HPET/PMTIMER
>> magic until later.
>
> Yes. I really would prefer to have this as an explicit expressed mechanism
> rather than relying on magic variables not being initialized.
What is the best way to achieve this?
I did the following:
1367 static bool __init determine_cpu_tsc_frequencies(bool early)
1368 {
1369 /* Make sure that cpu and tsc are not already calibrated */
1370 WARN_ON(cpu_khz || tsc_khz);
1371
1372 if (early) {
1373 cpu_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_cpu();
1374 tsc_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_tsc();
1375 } else {
1376 cpu_khz = hpet_pmtime_calibrate_cpu();
1377 }
833 /**
834 * native_calibrate_cpu - calibrate the cpu on boot
835 */
836 unsigned long native_calibrate_cpu(void)
837 {
838 unsigned long flags, fast_calibrate;
839
840 fast_calibrate = cpu_khz_from_cpuid();
841 if (fast_calibrate)
842 return fast_calibrate;
843
844 fast_calibrate = cpu_khz_from_msr();
845 if (fast_calibrate)
846 return fast_calibrate;
847
848 local_irq_save(flags);
849 fast_calibrate = quick_pit_calibrate();
850 local_irq_restore(flags);
851 if (fast_calibrate)
852 return fast_calibrate;
853
854 return hpet_pmtime_calibrate_cpu();
855 }
And hpet_pmtime_calibrate_cpu() contains all the hpet/pmtime stuff.
However, when cpu_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_cpu() is called the first time, we still call hpet_pmtime_calibrate_cpu() from native_calibrate_cpu(). We cannot simply split native_calibrate_cpu() into two independent functions because it is also called from recalibrate_cpu_khz().
So, the question is how to enforce that the first time we do not call hpet/pmtime?
1. Use a new global variable? Kind of ugly.
2. Use system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING ? Ugly, and probably not very safe.
Any other suggestion?
Thank you,
Pavel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists