[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23116da0-5dd7-b8fb-8450-a927a5647fb3@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 11:51:12 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
"David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amd/display/dc/dce: Fix multiple potential integer
overflows
Hi Alex, Harry,
I wonder if this patch should have been tagged for stable.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 07/04/2018 08:22 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Add suffix ULL to constant 5 and cast variables target_pix_clk_khz and
> feedback_divider to uint64_t in order to avoid multiple potential integer
> overflows and give the compiler complete information about the proper
> arithmetic to use.
>
> Notice that such constant and variables are used in contexts that
> expect expressions of type uint64_t (64 bits, unsigned). The current
> casts to uint64_t effectively apply to each expression as a whole,
> but they do not prevent them from being evaluated using 32-bit
> arithmetic instead of 64-bit arithmetic.
>
> Also, once the expressions are properly evaluated using 64-bit
> arithmentic, there is no need for the parentheses that enclose
> them.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1460245 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1460286 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1460401 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
> Fixes: 4562236b3bc0 ("drm/amd/dc: Add dc display driver (v2)")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Add suffix ULL to constant 5 instead of UL. Thanks to Michel Dänzer
> for pointing this out.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_clock_source.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_clock_source.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_clock_source.c
> index 88b09dd..ca13775 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_clock_source.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_clock_source.c
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static bool calculate_fb_and_fractional_fb_divider(
> uint64_t feedback_divider;
>
> feedback_divider =
> - (uint64_t)(target_pix_clk_khz * ref_divider * post_divider);
> + (uint64_t)target_pix_clk_khz * ref_divider * post_divider;
> feedback_divider *= 10;
> /* additional factor, since we divide by 10 afterwards */
> feedback_divider *= (uint64_t)(calc_pll_cs->fract_fb_divider_factor);
> @@ -145,8 +145,8 @@ static bool calculate_fb_and_fractional_fb_divider(
> * of fractional feedback decimal point and the fractional FB Divider precision
> * is 2 then the equation becomes (ullfeedbackDivider + 5*100) / (10*100))*/
>
> - feedback_divider += (uint64_t)
> - (5 * calc_pll_cs->fract_fb_divider_precision_factor);
> + feedback_divider += 5ULL *
> + calc_pll_cs->fract_fb_divider_precision_factor;
> feedback_divider =
> div_u64(feedback_divider,
> calc_pll_cs->fract_fb_divider_precision_factor * 10);
> @@ -203,8 +203,8 @@ static bool calc_fb_divider_checking_tolerance(
> &fract_feedback_divider);
>
> /*Actual calculated value*/
> - actual_calc_clk_khz = (uint64_t)(feedback_divider *
> - calc_pll_cs->fract_fb_divider_factor) +
> + actual_calc_clk_khz = (uint64_t)feedback_divider *
> + calc_pll_cs->fract_fb_divider_factor +
> fract_feedback_divider;
> actual_calc_clk_khz *= calc_pll_cs->ref_freq_khz;
> actual_calc_clk_khz =
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists