linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 11/14] treewide: Prepare to remove VLA usage for AHASH_REQUEST_ON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 19 Jul 2018 11:44:03 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
        Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com>,
        Lars Persson <larper@...s.com>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
        Rabin Vincent <rabinv@...s.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" 
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, qat-linux@...el.com,
        dm-devel@...hat.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/14] treewide: Prepare to remove VLA usage for AHASH_REQUEST_ON_STACK

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 7:54 AM, Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 19 July 2018 at 12:13, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 Jul 2018, at 12:09, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Ard Biesheuvel
>>> <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>> I have only build tested it, so if you make sure that it does not break anything, please go ahead.
>>>
>>> I can give it a spin; what's the best way? Is CONFIG_CRYPTO_MANAGER=y
>>> sufficient?
>>>
>>
>> You should be able to test ccm(aes) with tcrypt, yes
>
> Apologies, I should have been more clear here. I was replying on my
> phone while attending a meeting.
>
> The builtin test will only kick in for chaining mode templates if they
> are instantiated by something that invokes the algorithm, such as
> loading tcrypt.ko with mode=37 (assuming that ccm(aes) has to be
> instantiated from crypto/ccm.c and some AES cipher rather than being
> provided directly by, e.g., arm64's AES-CCM driver)
>
> I just did the tcrypt myself, and the patch appears to be fine. Let me
> know if you want me to spin the patch.

Awesome, thanks for testing! I built a commit with you as the author.
I'll send it out with the next batch... :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security