[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180719051631epcms5p8224b903510a4fe2414c30f3b6b02d7de@epcms5p8>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:46:31 +0530
From: Srikanth Korangala Hari <srikanth.h@...sung.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
CC: "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk" <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
"perex@...ex.cz" <perex@...ex.cz>,
"elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net" <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
CPGS <cpgs@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] Preventive fix in sound module
> The checks in proc are moot if we guarantee the non-NULL card at
> snd_timer_new() in the above.
> So it's not about fixing in sound module. It serves right. Your
> patch would add a sanity check to catch a buggy code in the caller
> side.
You are right Takashi, as you said this changes will catch buggy code in caller side.
Thank you for your respose.
Thanks,
Srikanth
Powered by blists - more mailing lists