linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 28/33] mtd: rawnand: docg4: convert driver to nand

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180719230026.8741-29-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:00:21 +0200
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...rochip.com>,
        Josh Wu <rainyfeeling@...look.com>,
        Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Han Xu <han.xu@....com>,
        Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
        Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@...il.com>,
        Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>,
        Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 28/33] mtd: rawnand: docg4: convert driver to nand_scan()

Two helpers have been added to the core to make ECC-related
configuration between the detection phase and the final NAND scan. Use
these hooks and convert the driver to just use nand_scan() instead of
both nand_scan_ident() and nand_scan_tail().

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/docg4.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/docg4.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/docg4.c
index 4dccdfba6140..2f6fcd4efab2 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/docg4.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/docg4.c
@@ -1227,10 +1227,9 @@ static void __init init_mtd_structs(struct mtd_info *mtd)
 	 * required within a nand driver because they are performed by the nand
 	 * infrastructure code as part of nand_scan().  In this case they need
 	 * to be initialized here because we skip call to nand_scan_ident() (the
-	 * first half of nand_scan()).  The call to nand_scan_ident() is skipped
-	 * because for this device the chip id is not read in the manner of a
-	 * standard nand device.  Unfortunately, nand_scan_ident() does other
-	 * things as well, such as call nand_set_defaults().
+	 * first half of nand_scan()).  The call to nand_scan_ident() could be
+	 * skipped because for this device the chip id is not read in the manner
+	 * of a standard nand device.
 	 */
 
 	struct nand_chip *nand = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
@@ -1315,6 +1314,27 @@ static int __init read_id_reg(struct mtd_info *mtd)
 
 static char const *part_probes[] = { "cmdlinepart", "saftlpart", NULL };
 
+static int docg4_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
+{
+	struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
+	struct docg4_priv *doc = (struct docg4_priv *)(chip + 1);
+
+	init_mtd_structs(mtd);
+
+	/* Initialize kernel BCH algorithm */
+	doc->bch = init_bch(DOCG4_M, DOCG4_T, DOCG4_PRIMITIVE_POLY);
+	if (!doc->bch)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	reset(mtd);
+
+	return read_id_reg(mtd);
+}
+
+static struct nand_controller_ops docg4_controller_ops = {
+	.attach_chip = docg4_attach_chip,
+};
+
 static int __init probe_docg4(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct mtd_info *mtd;
@@ -1350,26 +1370,16 @@ static int __init probe_docg4(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	mtd->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
 	doc->virtadr = virtadr;
 	doc->dev = dev;
-
-	init_mtd_structs(mtd);
-
-	/* initialize kernel bch algorithm */
-	doc->bch = init_bch(DOCG4_M, DOCG4_T, DOCG4_PRIMITIVE_POLY);
-	if (doc->bch == NULL) {
-		retval = -EINVAL;
-		goto free_nand;
-	}
-
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, doc);
 
-	reset(mtd);
-	retval = read_id_reg(mtd);
-	if (retval == -ENODEV) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "No diskonchip G4 device found.\n");
-		goto free_bch;
-	}
-
-	retval = nand_scan_tail(mtd);
+	/*
+	 * Asking for 0 chips is useless here but it warns the user that the use
+	 * of the nand_scan() function is a bit abused here because the
+	 * initialization is actually a bit specific and re-handled again in the
+	 * ->attach_chip() hook. It will probably leak some memory though.
+	 */
+	nand->dummy_controller.ops = &docg4_controller_ops;
+	retval = nand_scan(mtd, 0);
 	if (retval)
 		goto free_bch;
 
@@ -1389,7 +1399,6 @@ static int __init probe_docg4(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	nand_cleanup(nand);
 free_bch:
 	free_bch(doc->bch);
-free_nand:
 	kfree(nand);
 unmap:
 	iounmap(virtadr);
-- 
2.14.1