| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 09:17:45 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Cc: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...rochip.com>,
Josh Wu <rainyfeeling@...look.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Han Xu <han.xu@....com>,
Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus@...il.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@...il.com>,
Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>,
Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 28/33] mtd: rawnand: docg4: convert driver to
nand_scan()
Hi Boris,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com> wrote on Fri, 20 Jul 2018
01:27:32 +0200:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:00:21 +0200
> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> > Two helpers have been added to the core to make ECC-related
> > configuration between the detection phase and the final NAND scan. Use
> > these hooks and convert the driver to just use nand_scan() instead of
> > both nand_scan_ident() and nand_scan_tail().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/docg4.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/docg4.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/docg4.c
> > index 4dccdfba6140..2f6fcd4efab2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/docg4.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/docg4.c
> > @@ -1227,10 +1227,9 @@ static void __init init_mtd_structs(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> > * required within a nand driver because they are performed by the nand
> > * infrastructure code as part of nand_scan(). In this case they need
> > * to be initialized here because we skip call to nand_scan_ident() (the
> > - * first half of nand_scan()). The call to nand_scan_ident() is skipped
> > - * because for this device the chip id is not read in the manner of a
> > - * standard nand device. Unfortunately, nand_scan_ident() does other
> > - * things as well, such as call nand_set_defaults().
> > + * first half of nand_scan()). The call to nand_scan_ident() could be
> > + * skipped because for this device the chip id is not read in the manner
> > + * of a standard nand device.
> > */
> >
> > struct nand_chip *nand = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> > @@ -1315,6 +1314,27 @@ static int __init read_id_reg(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> >
> > static char const *part_probes[] = { "cmdlinepart", "saftlpart", NULL };
> >
> > +static int docg4_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
> > +{
> > + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> > + struct docg4_priv *doc = (struct docg4_priv *)(chip + 1);
> > +
> > + init_mtd_structs(mtd);
> > +
> > + /* Initialize kernel BCH algorithm */
> > + doc->bch = init_bch(DOCG4_M, DOCG4_T, DOCG4_PRIMITIVE_POLY);
> > + if (!doc->bch)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + reset(mtd);
> > +
> > + return read_id_reg(mtd);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct nand_controller_ops docg4_controller_ops = {
> > + .attach_chip = docg4_attach_chip,
> > +};
> > +
> > static int __init probe_docg4(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct mtd_info *mtd;
> > @@ -1350,26 +1370,16 @@ static int __init probe_docg4(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > mtd->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> > doc->virtadr = virtadr;
> > doc->dev = dev;
> > -
> > - init_mtd_structs(mtd);
> > -
> > - /* initialize kernel bch algorithm */
> > - doc->bch = init_bch(DOCG4_M, DOCG4_T, DOCG4_PRIMITIVE_POLY);
> > - if (doc->bch == NULL) {
> > - retval = -EINVAL;
> > - goto free_nand;
> > - }
> > -
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, doc);
> >
> > - reset(mtd);
> > - retval = read_id_reg(mtd);
> > - if (retval == -ENODEV) {
> > - dev_warn(dev, "No diskonchip G4 device found.\n");
> > - goto free_bch;
> > - }
> > -
> > - retval = nand_scan_tail(mtd);
> > + /*
> > + * Asking for 0 chips is useless here but it warns the user that the use
> > + * of the nand_scan() function is a bit abused here because the
> > + * initialization is actually a bit specific and re-handled again in the
> > + * ->attach_chip() hook. It will probably leak some memory though.
> > + */
> > + nand->dummy_controller.ops = &docg4_controller_ops;
> > + retval = nand_scan(mtd, 0);
> > if (retval)
> > goto free_bch;
>
> Hm, not sure this works. The driver only calls nand_scan_tail(), but
> you replace that by a call to nand_scan(), which will call both
> nand_scan_ident() and nand_scan_tail(), and I'm pretty sure
> nand_scan_ident() will fail here.
I know docg4 is a bit specific and could maybe be moved out of the raw/
subdirectory. But in the meantime I don't want to block the series for
this. The better I can propose right now (open to other ideas as
well) would be to return 0 in nand_scan_ident() if the maxchip parameter
is 0 which is the case only in this driver AFAIS.
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists