[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e3a1a45-d71c-2f63-0ec9-9a8071a491f1@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 10:07:10 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
robert.walker@....com, mike.leach@...aro.org,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] coresight: etm-perf: Add support for ETR backend
On 19/07/18 20:59, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 06:11:41PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> Add support for using TMC-ETR as backend for ETM perf tracing.
>> We use software double buffering at the moment. i.e, the TMC-ETR
>> uses a separate buffer than the perf ring buffer. The data is
>> copied to the perf ring buffer once a session completes.
>>
>> The TMC-ETR would try to match the larger of perf ring buffer
>> or the ETR buffer size configured via sysfs, scaling down to
>> a minimum limit of 1MB.
>>
>> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
>> ---
>> + CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
>> +
>> + tmc_flush_and_stop(drvdata);
>> + tmc_sync_etr_buf(drvdata);
>> +
>> + CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
>
> This is a copy/paste oversight, here you want to lock again.
Thanks for catching that, will fix it.
>
>> + /* Reset perf specific data */
>> + drvdata->perf_data = NULL;
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> +
>> + size = etr_buf->len;
>> + tmc_etr_sync_perf_buffer(etr_perf);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Update handle->head in snapshot mode. Also update the size to the
>> + * hardware buffer size if there was an overflow.
>> + */
>> + if (etr_perf->snapshot) {
>> + handle->head += size;
>> + if (etr_buf->full)
>> + size = etr_buf->size;
>> + }
>> +
>> + lost |= etr_buf->full;
>> +out:
>> + if (lost)
>> + perf_aux_output_flag(handle, PERF_AUX_FLAG_TRUNCATED);
>> + return size;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int tmc_enable_etr_sink_perf(struct coresight_device *csdev, void *data)
>> {
>> - /* We don't support perf mode yet ! */
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + int rc = 0;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent);
>> + struct perf_output_handle *handle = data;
>> + struct etr_perf_buffer *etr_perf = etm_perf_sink_config(handle);
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> + /*
>> + * There can be only one writer per sink in perf mode. If the sink
>> + * is already open in SYSFS mode, we can't use it.
>> + */
>> + if (drvdata->mode != CS_MODE_DISABLED || drvdata->perf_data) {
>> + rc = -EBUSY;
As discussed in the previous patch, I am missing a WARN_ON here : i.e,
+ if (drvdata->mode != CS_MODE_DISABLED || WARN_ON(drvdata->perf_data))
which was there in the previous version in set_buffer, which triggered some
warnings for me with testing.
>> + goto unlock_out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON(!etr_perf || !etr_perf->etr_buf)) {
>> + rc = -EINVAL;
>> + goto unlock_out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + etr_perf->head = PERF_IDX2OFF(handle->head, etr_perf);
>> + drvdata->perf_data = etr_perf;
>> + drvdata->mode = CS_MODE_PERF;
>> + tmc_etr_enable_hw(drvdata, etr_perf->etr_buf);
>> +
>> +unlock_out:
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> + return rc;
>> }
>>
>> static int tmc_enable_etr_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev,
>> @@ -1148,6 +1389,9 @@ static void tmc_disable_etr_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>> static const struct coresight_ops_sink tmc_etr_sink_ops = {
>> .enable = tmc_enable_etr_sink,
>> .disable = tmc_disable_etr_sink,
>> + .alloc_buffer = tmc_etr_alloc_perf_buffer,
>> + .update_buffer = tmc_etr_update_perf_buffer,
>> + .free_buffer = tmc_etr_free_perf_buffer,
>
>
> .alloc_buffer = tmc_alloc_etr_buffer,
> .update_buffer = tmc_update_etr_buffer,
> .free_buffer = tmc_free_etr_buffer,
>
> To be consistant with .enable and .disable along with the naming convention on
> the ETF side.
Sure, I can change them.
Cheers
Suzuki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists