[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb67ced4-eef8-abb5-5706-3282a55edbb2@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 12:16:04 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Aapo Vienamo <avienamo@...dia.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] dt-bindings: Add Tegra PMC pad configuration
bindings
Adding Linus ...
On 17/07/18 16:30, Aapo Vienamo wrote:
...
>>>>> +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +The values accepted by power-source property are
>>>>> +TEGRA_IO_PAD_VOLTAGE_1V8 and TEGRA_IO_PAD_VOLTAGE_3V3, which are defined
>>>>> +in dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra-io-pad.h.
>>>>
>>>> You need to list out what properties the child nodes can have.
>>>>
>>>> power-source needs a vendor prefix.
>>>
>>> Isn't it a generic pinctrl property?
>>
>> I don't know offhand. Doesn't look like it if you have custom values.
>
> It's listed under "Supported generic properties" in
> pinctrl-bindings.txt. The convention seems to be not to add a vendor
> prefix even though such custom macro values are used. The property is
> currently used by qcom,pmic-gpio, qcom,pmic-mpp, and renesas,pfc-pinctrl.
> I could not find a bindings document describing it with a vendor prefix.
Looking at other users of the 'power-source' property it is not clear to
me if the values should/can be vendor specific or not. I see cases where
some people use definitions and others use actual voltages.
Linus, any recommendations here?
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists