[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180720121816.GD10784@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 13:18:16 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Akshu Agrawal <akshu.agrawal@....com>
Cc: djkurtz@...omium.org, Alexander.Deucher@....com,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Dylan Reid <dgreid@...omium.org>,
"Mukunda, Vijendar" <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
"moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..."
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: AMD: Add a fix voltage regulator for DA7219 and
ADAU7002
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 02:38:11PM +0800, Akshu Agrawal wrote:
> static int cz_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int ret;
> struct snd_soc_card *card;
> struct acp_platform_info *machine;
> + static bool regulators_registered;
> +
> + if (!regulators_registered) {
> + ret = platform_device_register(&acp_da7219_regulator);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register regulator: %d\n",
> + ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + regulators_registered = true;
> + }
You should be unregistering the regulator in your remove function, not
doing this hack here. I'd also expect to see the card made the parent
of the device that gets registered.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists