[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180720163712.GU2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 18:37:12 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com, pjt@...gle.com, luto@...capital.net,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 7/9] cpuset: Expose cpus.effective and mems.effective
on cgroup v2 root
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:19:29PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> I am not against the idea of making it hierarchical eventually. I am
> just hoping to get thing going by merging the patchset in its current
> form and then we can make it hierarchical in a followup patch.
Where's the rush? Why can't we do this right in one go?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists