[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180721194829.44e9b29f@bbrezillon>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 19:48:29 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...rochip.com>,
Josh Wu <rainyfeeling@...look.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Han Xu <han.xu@....com>,
Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus@...il.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@...il.com>,
Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>,
Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 19/35] mtd: rawnand: sh_flctl: move all NAND chip
related setup in one function
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:15:11 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
> @@ -1007,6 +1007,16 @@ static int flctl_chip_init_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> struct sh_flctl *flctl = mtd_to_flctl(mtd);
> struct nand_chip *chip = &flctl->chip;
>
> + if (chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16) {
> + /*
> + * NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 may have been set by nand_scan_ident().
> + * Add the SEL_16BIT flag in pdata->flcmncr_val and re-assign
> + * flctl->flcmncr_base to pdata->flcmncr_val.
> + */
> + flctl->pdata->flcmncr_val |= SEL_16BIT;
> + flctl->flcmncr_base = flctl->pdata->flcmncr_val;
pdata->flcmncr_val is not used after this point. I think you can just do
flctl->flcmncr_base |= SEL_16BIT;
and get rid of the ftcl->pdata field you add in this patch.
> + }
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists