linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/nfsd: Delete invalid assignment statements in nfsd4_decode_exchange

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a6be2d3bf2ff5ac43f82dcb7b29ba32faccbbdaf.camel@hammerspace.com>
Date:   Sun, 22 Jul 2018 18:33:15 +0000
From:   Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>
To:     "nixiaoming@...wei.com" <nixiaoming@...wei.com>,
        "chuck.lever@...cle.com" <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
CC:     "bfields@...ldses.org" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jlayton@...nel.org" <jlayton@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/nfsd: Delete invalid assignment statements in
 nfsd4_decode_exchange_id

On Sun, 2018-07-22 at 14:12 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > On Jul 22, 2018, at 4:50 AM, nixiaoming <nixiaoming@...wei.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > dummy = be32_to_cpup(p++);
> > dummy = be32_to_cpup(p++);
> > Assigning value to "dummy" here, but that stored value
> > is overwritten before it can be used.
> > 
> > delete invalid assignment statements in nfsd4_decode_exchange_id
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: n00202754 <nixiaoming@...wei.com>
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> > index a96843c..8e78541 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> > @@ -1392,8 +1392,8 @@ nfsd4_decode_exchange_id(struct
> > nfsd4_compoundargs *argp,
> > 
> > 		/* ssp_window and ssp_num_gss_handles */
> > 		READ_BUF(8);
> > -		dummy = be32_to_cpup(p++);
> > -		dummy = be32_to_cpup(p++);
> > +		be32_to_cpup(p++);
> > +		be32_to_cpup(p++);
> 
> If these values are not used, what's the point of byte swapping them?
> Surely "p += 2;" should be enough.
> 
> 
> > 		break;
> > 	default:
> > 		goto xdr_error;
> 

Given that the value of 'p' isn't used either, why not just delete
those two lines altogether?

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@...merspace.com