[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180722123145.GA20029@onstation.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 12:31:45 +0000
From: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, andy.gross@...aro.org,
david.brown@...aro.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
jonathan@...ek.ca, jmaneyrol@...ensense.com, knaack.h@....de,
lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net, mkelly@...o.com,
fischerdouglasc@...il.com, bshah@....org, ctatlor97@...il.com,
drew.paterson@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] iio: imu: mpu6050: add support for regulator
framework
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 06:31:07PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 04:41:52 -0400
> Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org> wrote:
>
> > This patch adds support for the regulator framework to the mpu6050
> > driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
>
> I'm not 100% sure what the purpose of the regulator_enabled
> tracking is. Perhaps you could point out the path where that is
> needed?
I was thinking about the use case where the device is compiled into the
kernel as a module, the device is suspended, and then someone rmmods
the module. If that is not a use case that I need to worry about, then
the flag can go away and it will simplify the code.
Brian
> Also, a missing bit of documentation needs adding.
>
> Jonathan
>
> > ---
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Use devm_regulator_get() instead of devm_regulator_get_optional()
> > - Use devm_add_action() for cleaning up the regulator.
> > - Correct ordering of resume code.
> > - Add regulator_enabled flag to ensure regulator is not disabled twice,
> > specifically the case where the device is suspended and then the
> > driver is removed.
> >
> > Original extra changelog from v1:
> >
> > This is a variation of Jonathan Marek's patch from postmarketOS
> > https://gitlab.com/postmarketOS/linux-postmarketos/commit/b8ad1ec1859c8bbcbce94944b3f4dd68f8f9fc37
> > with the following changes:
> >
> > - Stripped out 6515 variant code.
> > - Add the regulator to the mpu core instead of only the i2c variant.
> > - Add error handling.
> > - Release the regulator on suspend, device remove, etc.
> > - Device tree documentation.
> >
> > .../bindings/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050.txt | 1 +
> > drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h | 3 +
> > 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050.txt
> > index b7def51c8ad9..d39907b12a46 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050.txt
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Required properties:
> > bindings.
> >
> > Optional properties:
> > + - vddio-supply: regulator phandle for VDDIO supply
> > - mount-matrix: an optional 3x3 mounting rotation matrix
> > - i2c-gate node. These devices also support an auxiliary i2c bus. This is
> > simple enough to be described using the i2c-gate binding. See
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> > index 12c1b9507007..e1fbab4bc0a0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> > #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> > #include <linux/acpi.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> > #include "inv_mpu_iio.h"
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -926,6 +927,46 @@ static int inv_check_and_setup_chip(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st)
> > return result;
> > }
> >
> > +static int inv_mpu_core_enable_regulator(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st)
> > +{
> > + int result;
> > +
> > + result = regulator_enable(st->vddio_supply);
> > + if (result) {
> > + dev_err(regmap_get_device(st->map),
> > + "Failed to enable regulator: %d\n", result);
> > + } else {
> > + st->regulator_enabled = true;
> > +
> > + /* Give the device a little bit of time to start up. */
> > + usleep_range(35000, 70000);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return result;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st)
> > +{
> > + int result;
> > +
> > + if (!st->regulator_enabled)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + result = regulator_disable(st->vddio_supply);
> > + if (result)
> > + dev_err(regmap_get_device(st->map),
> > + "Failed to disable regulator: %d\n", result);
> > +
> > + st->regulator_enabled = false;
> > +
> > + return result;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_action(void *_data)
> > +{
> > + inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator(_data);
> > +}
> > +
> > int inv_mpu_core_probe(struct regmap *regmap, int irq, const char *name,
> > int (*inv_mpu_bus_setup)(struct iio_dev *), int chip_type)
> > {
> > @@ -990,6 +1031,28 @@ int inv_mpu_core_probe(struct regmap *regmap, int irq, const char *name,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + st->vddio_supply = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vddio");
> > + if (IS_ERR(st->vddio_supply)) {
> > + if (PTR_ERR(st->vddio_supply) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get vddio regulator %d\n",
> > + (int)PTR_ERR(st->vddio_supply));
> > +
> > + return PTR_ERR(st->vddio_supply);
> > + }
> > +
> > + result = inv_mpu_core_enable_regulator(st);
> > + if (result)
> > + return result;
> > +
> > + result = devm_add_action(dev, inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_action,
> > + st);
> > + if (result) {
> > + inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_action(st);
> > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to setup regulator cleanup action %d\n",
> > + result);
> > + return result;
> > + }
> > +
> > /* power is turned on inside check chip type*/
> > result = inv_check_and_setup_chip(st);
> > if (result)
> > @@ -1049,7 +1112,12 @@ static int inv_mpu_resume(struct device *dev)
> > int result;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> > + result = inv_mpu_core_enable_regulator(st);
> > + if (result)
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > +
> > result = inv_mpu6050_set_power_itg(st, true);
> > +out_unlock:
> > mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> >
> > return result;
> > @@ -1062,6 +1130,11 @@ static int inv_mpu_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >
> > mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> > result = inv_mpu6050_set_power_itg(st, false);
> > + if (result)
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > +
> > + result = inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator(st);
> > +out_unlock:
> > mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> >
> > return result;
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h
> > index e69a59659dbc..01c8fe9b4fa0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h
> > @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ struct inv_mpu6050_hw {
> > * @chip_period: chip internal period estimation (~1kHz).
> > * @it_timestamp: timestamp from previous interrupt.
> > * @data_timestamp: timestamp for next data sample.
> > + * @vddio_supply voltage regulator for the chip.
> Docs missing for regulator_enabled.
> > */
> > struct inv_mpu6050_state {
> > struct mutex lock;
> > @@ -149,6 +150,8 @@ struct inv_mpu6050_state {
> > s64 chip_period;
> > s64 it_timestamp;
> > s64 data_timestamp;
> > + struct regulator *vddio_supply;
> > + bool regulator_enabled;
> > };
> >
> > /*register and associated bit definition*/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists