linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Jul 2018 13:09:05 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

Hi Mark,

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 6:50 PM, David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> Introduce bindings for RPMh regulator devices found on some
> Qualcomm Technlogies, Inc. SoCs.  These devices allow a given
> processor within the SoC to make PMIC regulator requests which
> are aggregated within the RPMh hardware block along with requests
> from other processors in the SoC to determine the final PMIC
> regulator hardware state.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
>  .../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt     | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  .../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h    |  36 +++++
>  2 files changed, 196 insertions(+)

I know you are still looking for time to review the RPMh-regulator
driver and that's fine.  One idea I had though: if the bindings look
OK to you and are less controversial, is there any chance they could
land in the meantime?

Specifically it would be very handy to be able to post up device tree
files that refer to regulators and even get those landed, but they
can't land without the bindings.

If that's not possible then no worries, but I figured I'd check.


-Doug