lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180723171715.23328c84@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jul 2018 17:17:15 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the xarray tree with the nvdimm tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the xarray tree got a conflict in:

  fs/dax.c

between commit:

  55f25ced654c ("filesystem-dax: Introduce dax_lock_mapping_entry()")

from the nvdimm tree and several commits from the xarray tree.

I have no idea how to fix this up, please discuss it and give me a
resolution (or better yet, create a command branch that both trees can
merge so that the conflicts do not exist any more).

I have temporarily dropped the xarray and ida trees for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ