linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] i2c: Add Actions Semiconductor Owl family S900 I2C driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180723072452.GA4353@mani>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jul 2018 12:54:52 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc:     wsa@...-dreams.de, robh+dt@...nel.org, afaerber@...e.de,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        liuwei@...ions-semi.com, mp-cs@...ions-semi.com,
        96boards@...obotics.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        andy.shevchenko@...il.com, daniel.thompson@...aro.org,
        amit.kucheria@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        hzhang@...obotics.com, bdong@...obotics.com,
        manivannanece23@...il.com, thomas.liau@...ions-semi.com,
        jeff.chen@...ions-semi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] i2c: Add Actions Semiconductor Owl family S900
 I2C driver

Hi Peter,

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 08:12:17AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-07-23 05:40, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > +		/* Handle the remaining bytes which were not sent */
> > +		while (!(readl(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_FIFOSTAT) &
> > +		       OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_TFF) && i2c_dev->msg_ptr < msg->len) {
> 
> You moved the OWL_ line to the left instead of right, so this is still
> misaligned and thus not helping the reader.
> 

Yes. I'm not sure which side I should shift but since the recommendation
states that we should start from the first character after parenthesis, so I
went for left.

But yeah, this could be more readable by shifting right.

Anyway, thanks a lot for helping me to cleanup/structure the code.

Regards,
Mani

> Cheers,
> Peter
> 
> > +			writel(msg->buf[i2c_dev->msg_ptr++],
> > +			       i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_TXDAT);
> > +		}
>