linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] [v2] m68k: mac: use time64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:08:15 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Joshua Thompson <funaho@...ai.org>,
        Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>,
        Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] [v2] m68k: mac: use time64_t in RTC handling

Hi Finn,

On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 1:56 PM Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, I wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > I'd suggest we do it like below to make it consistent with the rest
> > > again, using the 1904..2040 range of dates and no warning for invalid
> > > dates.
> > >
> > > If you agree, I'll send that as a proper patch.
> >
> > Geert may instead wish to fixup or revert the patch he has committed
> > already...
>
> Geert, how do you want to handle this?
>
> Do you want a fixup patch or a v3 patch with the WARN_ON and the other two
> issues addressed?

Please send a fixup patch, for the m68k/master branch, which is non-rebasing.
I'll fold it into the original commit on the m68k/for-next branch.

> I'm willing to send either one if Arnd is okay with that. I'd really like
> to resolve this before the merge window opens, since my PMU patch series
> is affected.

+1. If it's not resolved (a few days) before the merge window opens, I may have
to revert the patch instead.

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds