[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180723102841.58ea373b@alans-desktop>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:28:41 +0100
From: Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, peterz@...radead.org,
Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
linux@...linux.org.uk, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
x86@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com,
prarit@...hat.com, feng.tang@...el.com,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 20/25] x86/tsc: calibrate tsc only once
> >> If we determined tsc early in boot using one of the quick methods:
> >> from cpuid/msr/quick_pit, can we assume that frequencies of all other
> >> CPUs will be determined the same way? Or do we still have to fallback
Not on 32bit at least. You can have a mixed slot 1 SMP system such as
an ASUS BP6 with cores at say 300 and 450MHz.
Now whether you'll find any such system in the world today is another
question.
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists