lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 23 Jul 2018 12:40:45 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Chandan Uddaraju <chandanu@...eaurora.org>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-msm tree with the drm tree

Hi Rob,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-msm tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_manager.c

between commit:

  97e14fbeb53f ("drm: drop _mode_ from remaining connector functions")

from the drm tree and commit:

  b6a221993e7c ("drm/msm/dsi: Use one connector for dual DSI mode")

from the drm-msm tree.

I fixed it up (the latter removed code modified by the former) and can
carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ