[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e52ce60b6d0aed73ca171352a56d3e7@codethink.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 12:32:08 +0100
From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pgaikwad@...dia.com,
jonathanh@...dia.co, thierry.reding@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...ts.codethink.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] clk: tegra: host1x has fractional divider
On 2018-07-23 12:12, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:32:58AM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2018-07-23 09:50, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>> >On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 02:45:26PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
>> >>The host1x clock according to both tegra2 and tegra3 manuals is
>> >>an 8bit divider with lsb being fractional. This is running into
>> >>an issue where the host1x is being set on a tegra20a system to
>> >>266.4MHz but ends up at 222MHz instead.
>> >>
>> >
>> >The fact the hw has a fractional divider, does not mean we're
>> >allowed to use
>> >it. Due to the non 50% duty cycle of fractional divided clocks,
>> >they are not
>> >allowed for certain peripherals. Do you have information
>> >indicating this is
>> >ok for the host1x clock?
>>
>> Only that's what was setup for the systems we're using.
>> We couldn't match the 2.6 working system without these changes.
>>
>
> On Tegra20 or Tegra30?
I'll check tomorrow when I have access to all the hw involved.
--
Ben
Powered by blists - more mailing lists