lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180723122446.802635463@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:24:17 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...el.com>,
        Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.17 11/63] x86/events/intel/ds: Fix bts_interrupt_threshold alignment

4.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>

commit 2c991e408df6a407476dbc453d725e1e975479e7 upstream.

Markus reported that BTS is sporadically missing the tail of the trace
in the perf_event data buffer: [decode error (1): instruction overflow]
shown in GDB; and bisected it to the conversion of debug_store to PTI.

A little "optimization" crept into alloc_bts_buffer(), which mistakenly
placed bts_interrupt_threshold away from the 24-byte record boundary.
Intel SDM Vol 3B 17.4.9 says "This address must point to an offset from
the BTS buffer base that is a multiple of the BTS record size."

Revert "max" from a byte count to a record count, to calculate the
bts_interrupt_threshold correctly: which turns out to fix problem seen.

Fixes: c1961a4631da ("x86/events/intel/ds: Map debug buffers in cpu_entry_area")
Reported-and-tested-by: Markus T Metzger <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...el.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@...el.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.14+
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LSU.2.11.1807141248290.1614@eggly.anvils
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c |    8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -408,9 +408,11 @@ static int alloc_bts_buffer(int cpu)
 	ds->bts_buffer_base = (unsigned long) cea;
 	ds_update_cea(cea, buffer, BTS_BUFFER_SIZE, PAGE_KERNEL);
 	ds->bts_index = ds->bts_buffer_base;
-	max = BTS_RECORD_SIZE * (BTS_BUFFER_SIZE / BTS_RECORD_SIZE);
-	ds->bts_absolute_maximum = ds->bts_buffer_base + max;
-	ds->bts_interrupt_threshold = ds->bts_absolute_maximum - (max / 16);
+	max = BTS_BUFFER_SIZE / BTS_RECORD_SIZE;
+	ds->bts_absolute_maximum = ds->bts_buffer_base +
+					max * BTS_RECORD_SIZE;
+	ds->bts_interrupt_threshold = ds->bts_absolute_maximum -
+					(max / 16) * BTS_RECORD_SIZE;
 	return 0;
 }
 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ