[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180723141304.3300-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 22:13:04 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: minchan@...nel.org, ngupta@...are.org,
sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] block: zram: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL
read_from_bdev_async() and write_to_bdev() are never called in atomic
context. They call bio_alloc() with GFP_ATOMIC, which is not necessary.
GFP_ATOMIC can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL.
This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
---
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index 0f3fadd71230..b958ed0b8c35 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int read_from_bdev_async(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
{
struct bio *bio;
- bio = bio_alloc(GFP_ATOMIC, 1);
+ bio = bio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL, 1);
if (!bio)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ static int write_to_bdev(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
struct bio *bio;
unsigned long entry;
- bio = bio_alloc(GFP_ATOMIC, 1);
+ bio = bio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL, 1);
if (!bio)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.17.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists