[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180723151603.GC2458@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 17:16:03 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...nel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
vincent.weaver@...ne.edu, jolsa@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/perf/intel: Introduce PMU flag for Extended PEBS
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 06:15:39PM -0800, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>
> The Extended PEBS feature, introduced in Goldmont Plus
> microarchitecture, supports all events as "Extended PEBS".
>
> Introduce flag PMU_FL_PEBS_ALL to indicate the platforms which support
> extended PEBS.
> To support all events, it needs to support all constraints for PEBS. To
> avoid duplicating all the constraints in the PEBS table, making the PEBS
> code search the normal constraints too.
>
So I like PEBS_ALL.. what I don't like is that it seems to be mutually
exclusive with PEBS Load Latency.
Took the patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists